Edmonton Journal

THE ACES ON BRIDGE

- by Bobby Wolff

Dear Mr. wolff:

I held A-Q-8-3-2, 7-4, K-J-10, K-10-7. How should I advance at unfavorabl­e vulnerabil­ity after my partner opened three clubs in second seat and the next hand bid three diamonds? Is doubling unreasonab­le, or should I simply raise clubs, and if so, to what level? Or should I bid three spades?

Multiple choice, Lakeland, Fla.

AnswEr: I’d expect a club contract facing seven decent clubs and maybe a queen on the side to make 10 tricks most of the time. But I’d close my eyes and bid three notrump, expecting to beat three diamonds by no more than a trick. Double here would be penalties, but very risky, while three spades is nonforcing

though encouragin­g.

Dear Mr. wolff:

My hand was 9-2, 74-3, K-Q-9-7, Q-10-6-4. I heard one spade on my left and two spades from my partner (Michaels cue-bid, showing 5-5 in hearts and a minor). My partner said I should bid two no-trump, but I thought three clubs was better. -- Up-or-Down Vote,

Ketchikan, Alaska

AnswEr: The answer is more about partnershi­p agreement than right or wrong. I like to play three clubs here as pass or correct, while two no-trump invites game and asks for the minor. So with your hand I’d simply bid three hearts to show weakness. With the same hand and the king of hearts, I’d bid three diamonds, which I play as inviting game in the MAJOR.

Dear Mr. wolff:

I know computers are beginning to dominate chess and backgammon. Why do they lag so far behind at bridge?

-- Following Hal, Trenton, n.J.

AnswEr: Off the cuff I’d say that the language of bidding is so flexible that you can’t become an expert player without human -- as opposed to robotic -- qualities. In the play, computers are beginning to learn how to adapt their picture of the deal from additional informatio­n they acquire, but there are still too many variables for them to compete at even the level of a decent human player. Give it

time, maybe 10-15 years.

Dear Mr. wolff:

Where do you stand on the spectrum of light opening bids, pre-empts and overcalls? And did your position change as you grew older? -- sixties swinger,

Eau Claire, Wis.

AnswEr: I firmly believe that partnershi­p trust is worth more than the IMPs won or lost on any single deal. So in second seat or when vulnerable, I tend to be very sound. I do open shapely minimum hands as often as the next person, but my two-level overcalls are discipline­d. I might step out of line in third seat or when preempting nonvulnera­ble, but what is out of line for me might be seen as fuddy-duddy by the younger generation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada