Edmonton Journal

New Stonehenge theory: It was a graveyard

Study suggests later use centred around celebratio­ns, feasts

- Sylvia Hui

LONDON — British researcher­s have proposed a new theory for the origins of Stonehenge: It may have started as a giant burial ground for elite families around 3000 B.C.

New studies of cremated human remains excavated from the site suggest that about 500 years before the Stonehenge we know today was built, a larger stone circle was erected at the same site as a community graveyard, researcher­s said Saturday.

“These were men, women, children, so presumably family groups,” said University College London professor Mike Parker Pearson, who led the team. “We’d thought that maybe it was a place where a dynasty of kings was buried, but this seemed to be much more of a community, a different kind of power structure.”

Parker Pearson said archeologi­sts studied the cremated bones of 63 individual­s, and believed they were buried around 3000 B.C. The location of many of the cremated bodies was originally marked by bluestones, he said. That earlier circular enclosure, which measured around 91 metres across, could have been the burial ground for about 200 more people.

The team also put forth some theories about the purpose of the second Stonehenge — the monument still standing in the countrysid­e in southern England.

Various theories have been proposed about Stonehenge, including that it was a place for Druid worship, an observator­y for astronomic­al studies, or a place of healing, built by early inhabitant­s of Britain who roamed around with their herds.

Parker Pearson said the latest study suggested that Stonehenge should be seen less a temple of worship than a kind of building project that served to unite people from across Britain.

Analysis of the remains of a Neolithic settlement near the monument indicated that thousands of people travelled from as far as Scotland to the site, bringing their livestock and families for huge feasts and celebratio­ns during the winter and summer solstices.

“We don’t think (the builders) were living there all the time. We could tell that by when they were killing the pigs — they were there for the solstices,” he said.

The researcher­s believe that the builders converged seasonally to build Stonehenge, but not for very long — likely over a period of a decade or so.

 ?? Matt Dunham/ The Associated Press files ?? British researcher­s have proposed a new theory for the origins of Stonehenge: It may have started as a giant burial ground for elite families around 3,000 B.C.
Matt Dunham/ The Associated Press files British researcher­s have proposed a new theory for the origins of Stonehenge: It may have started as a giant burial ground for elite families around 3,000 B.C.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada