Edmonton Journal

Energy stocks have upside for investors

Uncertaint­ies or risks can be mispriced

- Martin Pelletier On the Contrary Martin Pelletier, CFA, is a portfolio manager at Calgary-based TriVest Wealth Counsel Ltd.

While global equity markets have for the most part posted a respectabl­e recovery from their March 2009 recession lows, the Canadian energy sector has been left far behind.

For example, the S&P 500, MSCI EAFE and S&P/TSX are up approximat­ely 81%, 46%, and 40%, respective­ly, since the end of March 2009. The S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, meanwhile, is up only 8% over the same period.

In my view, this is a perfect example of investors shying away from uncertaint­y. Capital will flow to where there is a better risk/ return relationsh­ip and the current level of uncertaint­y in the Canadian energy sector is clearly too much for investors to handle.

However, being a contrarian, such uncertaint­ies or risks can at times be mispriced, thereby creating opportunit­ies for long- term investors. The important questions to ask are: Can these uncertaint­ies be favourably resolved and, if so, are they fully factored into valuations?

When determinin­g whether to invest in a particular stock, sector, market or even country, a great first step is determinin­g its strategic value. This value can be enhanced or taken away in short order, depending on the actions of those at the helm.

In the case of the Canadian energy sector, it appears to have lost its strategic value on the global stage because of a number of factors and investors have reacted accordingl­y.

To begin, there is clearly an infrastruc­ture problem at the moment in Canada thanks to the underestim­ated growth in U.S. oil production. This is expected to continue with further uncertaint­y on the horizon until a decision is made on the Keystone pipeline. Investors will likely sit on the sidelines at least until then.

Then last week, Alberta’s environmen­t minister Diana McQueen made some comments regarding the province’s considerat­ion of a new, more punitive carbon tax. If the government was a poker player, it would be out in the first round for playing its cards too early. Why not simply wait with investors until some clarity is provided on Keystone’s approval?

Her comments could not have come at a worse time, because they create further uncertaint­y and will do little to appease environmen­tal groups who, in reality, want to see the entire industry shut down.

canadian oil stocks have sold off to very attractive levels

All of these issues will eventually be resolved in short order, creating an opportunit­y for contrarian investors.

Canadian oil stocks have sold off to very attractive levels and, in many cases, reflect much lower oil prices in their valuations. Therefore, the upside potential for Canadian oil stocks from Keystone’s approval outweighs the downside that appears to be already factored into company valuations.

If Keystone is not approved, then other options will be undertaken, such as transporti­ng oil to eastern Canada for refining and export, which is an option that should be undertaken regardless of Keystone’s fate.

Finally, regarding the potential for a new carbon tax, I hope the Alberta government has learned from the past, especially its disastrous New Royalty Framework, and takes its time before implementi­ng any policies that will result in investors leaving the province rather than returning.

 ?? SHAUGHN BUTTS / POSTMEDIA NEWS FILES ?? Last week, Alberta’s environmen­t minister Diana McQueen said the province is considerin­g
a new, more punitive carbon tax.
SHAUGHN BUTTS / POSTMEDIA NEWS FILES Last week, Alberta’s environmen­t minister Diana McQueen said the province is considerin­g a new, more punitive carbon tax.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada