Edmonton Journal

Right mix of purchases can ease shopping shame, study finds

- MISTY HARRIS

Scholars from a prestigiou­s American business school have united to address one of the most important questions of the modern age: Does hemorrhoid ointment become less embarrassi­ng when paired with the purchase of a magazine?

Reporting in the Journal of Consumer Research, Neal Roese and Sean Blair investigat­e whether the anticipate­d humiliatio­n of a purchase can be quelled by the addition of non-embarrassi­ng products. Not only did they find this strategy was unreliable in diminishin­g mortificat­ion, in some cases it actually made things worse.

“What matters ... is not the individual products; what matters is the set of products,” said lead author Blair, a doctoral candidate in marketing at Northweste­rn University’s Kellogg School of Management.

“It’s about what this basket says about me, and the story that (the contents) are telling.”

Across five experiment­s with more than 700 people, Roese — a noted professor of marketing — and Blair found that the nature of a shopping basket’s compositio­n plays a pivotal role in whether anticipate­d embarrassm­ent is suppressed.

When the additional products are unrelated to the embarrassi­ng product — say, adding new underwear to the purchase of an anti-odour foot powder — the strategy indeed tends to lower the chances of flushed cheeks. However, when the additional products are complement­ary — adding new underwear to the purchase of anti-diarrheal medication — people’s embarrassm­ent is exacerbate­d.

“What really matters isn’t how much something hides an embarrassi­ng product — though that could be part of it,” Blair said. “It’s about how it relates to the embarrassi­ng product.”

Unsurprisi­ngly, self-consciousn­ess is a factor.

Take, for example, an experiment in which male consumers were sent to the drugstore to purchase either anti-gas medication or condoms. In addition to the embarrassi­ng product, they could add a bottle of lotion and a box of tissues at no personal cost.

Males who were less selfconsci­ous took the freebies regardless of the embarrassi­ng product they’d been assigned to buy. But highly self-conscious males were much more likely to decline the freebies when they were complement­ary to the main purchase (condoms) than when they were unrelated (anti-gas meds).

“It’s an interestin­g commentary on the social nature of human beings,” Blair said.

“Cashiers are people we don’t know and will probably never see again, yet we care so much what they think that we’re willing to spend money buying things we don’t want, and even give up free stuff” just to save face.

Notably, when additional products did reduce embarrassm­ent, it appeared to be related to the products’ capacity to compensate for the main purchase.

This bears out in an experiment in which consumers were asked to imagine their level of embarrassm­ent if purchasing The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Improving Your IQ. Half were told the book was the sole purchase, while the other half were told they were also buying two counterbal­ancing products: a Rubik’s Cube and a copy of Scientific American.

Those in the latter group indeed reported less embarrassm­ent because they felt the additional products cancelled out the undesirabl­e impression of the book.

A followup study showed that the more people believed that a shopping basket’s contents compensate­d for an embarrassi­ng product, the more effective those other items were at reducing humiliatio­n.

 ?? SUPPLIED ?? Consumers believe buying a Rubik’s Cube with an embarrassi­ng book reduces checkout-counter humiliatio­n, a study shows.
SUPPLIED Consumers believe buying a Rubik’s Cube with an embarrassi­ng book reduces checkout-counter humiliatio­n, a study shows.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada