Edmonton Journal

Could Manitoba hydro boost oilsands?

- STEVEN FLETCHER Steven Fletcher is a geological engineer and the Conservati­ve MP for Charleswoo­d- St. James Assiniboia- Headlingle­y. He is a former minister of state for transport and helped develop the new Building Canada Plan, the largest infrastruc­ture

The new federal infrastruc­ture plan known as the Building Canada Plan 2013 has billions of dollars set aside for infrastruc­ture projects of regional significan­ce — in other words, projects that cross provincial boundaries.

This nation-building concept using federal government assistance has already been establishe­d with the building of the Lower Churchill generation and transmissi­on system from Labrador to Newfoundla­nd, Nova Scotia and beyond.

Since Manitoba Hydro produces some of the cheapest and most environmen­tally friendly power on the planet, a next logical project to be funded by the plan would be to head west and have Alberta greatly reduce greenhouse gas emissions by importing clean hydroelect­ricity from Manitoba — a project that would displace electricit­y now generated from coal-fired plants.

Alberta’s Fort McMurray, for example, could be supplied directly from dams on the Nelson River in northern Manitoba. Such a transmissi­on link could provide cheap, reliable power while also reducing Alberta’s carbon footprint, a win-win scenario for many interested parties and jurisdicti­ons.

Who would stand to benefit from such an initiative? And exactly how would they benefit?

Manitoba benefits in more than one way. Such an initiative introduced now would help ensure future revenues for Manitoba Hydro at a time its traditiona­l markets in the U.S. have softened in terms of demand and price.

Manitoba needs an alternativ­e export market to help finance large hydro dams planned for the Nelson River. That market could logically be found in Saskatchew­an, Alberta and northern Ontario. The technology required for a 1,000-kilometre transmissi­on line has been long establishe­d in Manitoba and Alberta.

In Manitoba these directcurr­ent transmissi­on lines have existed for more than 40 years. Originally subsidized by the federal government in the 1960s, they have paid for themselves many times over.

Another benefit is the capacity of a transmissi­on line from Manitoba could be increased in the future as Alberta’s demand increases — a reality that would benefit both provinces. There could also be a tap off the line to supply power to coal-burning Saskatchew­an if required, adding another provincial beneficiar­y to the concept. As the project advances, it would form part of a Trans-Canada transmissi­on system, thus benefiting the nation as a whole.

A direct transmissi­on line from hydro dams in Manitoba to Fort McMurray, through northern Saskatchew­an, is a new idea that has not as yet been given serious considerat­ion. Previous alternativ­es have focused on going south via cities such as Winnipeg, Regina and Calgary.

A northern route, however, would be the shortest and cheapest route, providing a practical and environmen­tally friendly option for Manitoba and its neighbours — a best for the west alternativ­e.

Internatio­nally, there would also be winners if such a transmissi­on line is built. Although all states bordering the route have approved the proposed Keystone XL pipeline designed to carry oil from Alberta to the United States, President Barack Obama suggests that approval of the pipeline should not happen without assurances the carbon footprint of Alberta’s oilsands is minimized.

While other nations providing oil to the U.S. are not being similarly challenged, nonetheles­s Obama has said that Canada’s oilsands and Keystone XL advocates must demonstrat­e environmen­tal sensitivit­y through action. One way to achieve this is for Alberta to import clean hydroelect­ricity from Manitoba to displace electricit­y now generated from coal-fired plants, thus greatly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Certainly, the coal lobby in Alberta would not welcome competitio­n supplying clean power. However, a diversifie­d energy supply that includes energy coming from environmen­tally friendly and low-cost hydro is a win for those who support the oilsands and for those who want to reduce Alberta’s emissions. Moreover, diversifyi­ng the energy supply would go a long ways toward addressing President Obama’s concern about the Keystone XL pipeline.

A transmissi­on line from Manitoba to Alberta would be a straightfo­rward project and an obvious candidate for the Building Canada Fund. There is a demand in Alberta for cheap, clean power and that demand can be met by Manitoba, with spinoff benefits for many. It would be prudent to seize the opportunit­y and make stronger provinces in a stronger Canada.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada