Edmonton Journal

City police violated privacy laws

Ruling raps 2012 campaign to find offenders

-

The office of Alberta’s Privacy Commission­er has found the Edmonton Police Service violated privacy legislatio­n during a 2012 campaign to clear up outstandin­g warrants.

The report by the Office of the Informatio­n and Privacy Commission­er of Alberta said EPS “did not make reasonable security arrangemen­ts to protect personal informatio­n as required” under the province’s Freedom of Informatio­n and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPP), and that the police agency “had authority to disclose some, but not all, of the personal informatio­n” released during the warrant campaign.

“Certainly this investigat­ion has shown that privacy wasn’t something that was considered in the design and implementa­tion of this initiative,” said Jill Clayton, the informatio­n and privacy commission­er.

The report, written by senior informatio­n and privacy manager Veronica Chodak, looked at Project OWE, a 2012 initiative by Edmonton police that publicly identified people with outstandin­g warrants. The report says personal informatio­n such as names, ages, photograph­s, height and/or weight was disclosed on about 170 people during the campaign, which involved both newspaper ads and online publicatio­n.

Project OWE sparked controvers­y when it was discovered that a teenage girl had been identified in one of the EPS advertisem­ents, seemingly in contravent­ion of the Youth Criminal Justice Act.

The report released Monday notes the privacy commission­er’s office doesn’t have jurisdicti­on to investigat­e potential contravent­ions of the federal Youth Criminal Justice Act, but that the commission­er decided to investigat­e the project of her own volition.

“It was a campaign that involved the release of personal informatio­n in a very public way and that’s the sort of thing that does get my attention,” Clayton said. “I had some questions of my own as to whether that was done in accordance with the FOIPP Act.”

There were no complaints filed by anyone who had their informatio­n disclosed by EPS.

The report found EPS policies and procedures generally “support overall privacy management,” but that little or no assessment was done before Project OWE in regards to the release of private informatio­n. Similarly, the report said there was nothing to show there had been an assessment of legal authority before the project began.

Areas of concern noted in the report were that EPS provided no informatio­n to demonstrat­e that the disclosure of the personal informatio­n was “necessary,” which is required under the FOIPP Act.

The report also found that the release of informatio­n in the project was inconsiste­nt, and that EPS contravene­d the act when it published the names and photos of people no longer wanted on warrants. (Those people appeared with “solved” stamped over their image.)

The report recommende­d EPS develop a “review and approval process” plus a “Privacy Impact Assessment” for the privacy commission­er before launching a similar project in future.

Chief Rod Knecht said in a statement Monday that the EPS will establish a policy requiring a Privacy Impact Assessment, or similar legal review, for any such projects.

“Although the first Project OWE accomplish­ed a lot, with more than 5,000 warrants cleared from the system, we acknowledg­e that some errors were made,” he said, adding the EPS plans more similar campaigns.

 ??  ?? Jill Clayton
Jill Clayton

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada