Edmonton Journal

ER death a homicide, lawyers tell inquest

- Chinta Puxley

WINNIPEG —Lawyers for the family of an aboriginal man who died during a 34-hour emergency room wait say an inquest judge must rule the death a homicide.

They have also asked the judge to recommend Manitoba call a public inquiry into how aboriginal people are treated in the health-care system.

Vilko Zbogar told Judge Tim Preston that failing to provide medical care to a sick person is akin to failing to provide the necessitie­s of life.

“It was homicide,” Zbogar said during final arguments Thursday at the Brian Sinclair inquest.

“You just need to find that the death was caused by human contributi­on.”

Police have already investigat­ed the death but did not lay any criminal charges.

It’s been almost six years since Sinclair, a doubleampu­tee, died at Winnipeg’s Health Sciences Centre. He was referred to the emergency room in September 2008 because of a blocked catheter.

He languished in the waiting room for hours, vomiting and slowly dying from a treatable bladder infection, but was never asked if he was waiting for medical care. An internal report after his death found some staff assumed he was drunk and waiting for a ride or was a homeless man seeking shelter.

Murray Tratchenbe­rg, another lawyer representi­ng the family, said those racist assumption­s about the dishevelle­d double-amputee led to his death.

Why Sinclair sat in his wheelchair slowly dying for hours without any medical attention cannot be explained by an overcrowde­d emergency room, by the physical layout or even by the fact that the 45-year-old was never triaged, he said.

Many nurses, aides and security guards saw Sinclair in the emergency room but assumed he was “sleeping it off” or homeless, Tratchenbe­rg said.

“We’re talking about negative stereotypi­ng — stereotypi­ng that led to numerous assumption­s being made, all of which significan­tly contribute­d to Mr. Sinclair’s death,” he told the inquest. “It caused medical staff, who had the responsibi­lity to intervene and provide Mr. Sinclair with the care he needed, not to do so.”

The inquest didn’t delve into why those assumption­s were made or what to do to prevent them, the Sinclair lawyers argued. The Sinclair family lawyers withdrew from the inquest halfway through when the judge chose to focus on overcrowdi­ng in emergency rooms, but they returned for final recommenda­tions.

The judge should urge the Manitoba government to call a public inquiry into how aboriginal and marginaliz­ed people are treated in the health-care system, they said.

The inquest has heard testimony that aboriginal people face discrimina­tion and stereotypi­ng the minute they walk into an ER and are less likely to receive life-saving treatment.

“This inquest did not deal with the issues of systemic discrimina­tion and assumption-making and dismissive attitudes toward the public that came out very clearly in this inquest,” Zbogar said outside court. “The judge didn’t think he had the capacity to deal with that issue in this process. He said it’s not a public inquiry, so that’s what we need.”

The inquest concluded Thursday. Preston has six months to deliver his recommenda­tions.

 ?? The Canadian Press ?? Brian Sinclair, top right in wheelchair, is shown in 2008 hospital surveillan­ce footage.
The Canadian Press Brian Sinclair, top right in wheelchair, is shown in 2008 hospital surveillan­ce footage.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada