The good and the bad of Brazil for all to see
Tournament focus of joy and anger in soccer-mad land
RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil — Brazil’s day has finally arrived.
The sun rose Thursday on a tropical nation hosting its first World Cup in 64 years. Nearly half the world’s population, well over three billion spectators, is expected to watch soccer’s premier event and get a glimpse of the country that in two years will host the Summer Olympics.
It still isn’t clear which Brazil we’ll see over the course of the event.
Will it be the irreverent nation known for its festive, freewheeling spirit? Or the country that for the past year has been a hotbed of fury over poor public services, discontent over a political system widely viewed as corrupt, and deep anger over the $11.5 billion spent on hosting the World Cup? Perhaps, it will be both. “The world is going to see multitudes cheering for soccer, but also demanding that our country change,” Helen Santos, a teacher, said as she walked home in Rio de Janeiro. “The world needs to see that we’re a serious country. We’re not just a nation of soccer, but a country striving and demanding the government provide better education and health care. The world needs to see the reality of Brazil, not just the sport.”
Brazil got off on a winning note, defeating Croatia 3-1 in Sao Paulo on Thursday. Brazilians are hungry to see their soccer juggernaut deliver a record sixth World Cup crown to a nation desiring something — anything — to celebrate after enduring a year of gruelling protests and strikes.
There still is the chance for unrest. Anti-World Cup protesters in Sao Paulo and at least five other major cities have called for demonstrations during the tournament. Air travellers landing in Rio de Janeiro found a portion of airport workers striking Thursday for higher wages, but Sao Paulo averted a transportation mess when its subway workers voted against resuming their walkout on the World Cup’s opening day.
Street protests have lessened in size since last year when Brazilians staged raucous rallies against the government, overshadowing the Confederations Cup soccer tournament. On one night, about a million people spontaneously spilled into the streets of various cities. For two weeks, dozens of places were disturbed by unrest.
Whether Brazilians have moved past such disruption is uncertain.
“I hope the soccer outshines the protests, but I also know there remains a climate of anger,” said Edson Carvalho, an office assistant watching 10 barefoot young men play a pickup soccer match in Rio’s Botafogo neighbourhood. “What will the world see? I’m waiting to find out myself.”
In 2007, when FIFA named Brazil as the host nation for the 2014 World Cup, the country’s folksy and immensely popular president at the time, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, told a celebratory gathering in Zurich he would return home filled with joy, but also feeling the burden that comes with hosting the world’s biggest sporting event.
“At the heart of the matter, we’re here assuming as a nation, as the Brazilian state, to prove to the world, that we’re one of those nations that has achieved stability,” Silva said then. “Yes, we’re a country that has many problems, but we’re a nation with men determined to resolve those problems.”
Silva added he “wanted to assure FIFA officials” that Brazil would prove able to put on a great Cup.
Seven years on, as the global spotlight finally shines on Brazil, the world will see a great sporting event, with soccer returning to one of its most passionate cores, on a continent that relishes the game.
But the glare also will glow on those problems Silva referred to, the lingering ills that have not gone away.