Edmonton Journal

Alberta needs to take action on housing prices

Easing developmen­t charges could help,

- Wendell Cox writes Wendell Cox is a senior fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Runaway house price increases have become the rule across Canada. Since 2000, home prices across the country rose more than incomes in all of 35 larger markets, while prices rose more than four times incomes in Toronto and Vancouver.

This is in stark contrast to the three decades after 1970, when Canadian home prices rose at about the same rate as household incomes, hovering at approximat­ely three times household incomes. Mortgage interest rates are likely to increase in the next few years, which would make it even more expensive to purchase a home.

Housing affordabil­ity is important not only to people, but also to the economy. Housing is typically the largest expenditur­e in the household budget. When costs rise substantia­lly, households have less discretion­ary income, a lower standard of living and purchase less in other goods and services. This can hobble job creation and economic growth. The overall house price increase in the 35 markets was five times the general inflation rate, four times the increase in gasoline prices and higher than any other major expenditur­e item in the Consumer Price Index.

In response to all of this, concerns have been raised by the Bank of Canada, as well as internatio­nal organizati­ons such as the Organizati­on for Economic Cooperatio­n and Developmen­t and the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund.

Until recently, it could be assumed that middle-income households could afford to buy their own homes and that housing subsidies were needed only for lower income households. Runaway house price increases are changing this. According to the Royal Bank affordabil­ity report, the median income household needs 61 per cent of its income in Toronto and 81 per cent in Vancouver to pay the mortgage on the average-priced house or condominiu­m.

Alberta’s two large metropolit­an areas have also experience­d runaway housing prices.

Between 2000 and 2015 the average house price rose approximat­ely 162 per cent in the Calgary metropolit­an area. By comparison, the average household income increased a healthy, but much smaller 73 per cent. Thus, house prices increased at a rate of 2.2 times that of household incomes.

Home prices rose even more sharply relative to incomes in Edmonton. The average household income increased strongly in Edmonton, up 75 per cent between 2000 and 2015. However, the average house increased much more, at 202 per cent, or 2.7 times household incomes.

Why have middle-income house prices increased so much? Demand has been driven higher by lower interest rates. But this also happened in other nations, and where builders were able to respond to demand by building a sufficient number of houses, price increases were modest. Then, strong inter-provincial migration drove prices up as builders struggled to meet demand in the mid-2000s, a result of Alberta’s strong economic growth. This drove prices higher, but once building activity met the demand, prices should have fallen back to historic norms. They did not.

In the meantime, the effect of stronger land use regulation became evident, with barriers to building on inexpensiv­e greenfield land, while high developmen­t fees and levies had become higher. In response, prices continued to rise.

Meanwhile, economic conditions over the past year in Alberta have brought a respite in house price increases. But, when a more normal economy returns, the rapid house price increases seem likely to resume, driven by the stronger land use regulation­s and further intensifie­d by higher interest rates. This will further burden Alberta households, some who will have to pay more to buy houses, and others who would be denied the opportunit­y for ownership by the higher prices.

Government­s should take action to keep house prices under control. A critical part of this is addressing the fundamenta­l economic relationsh­ip between overzealou­s land use regulation and higher house prices. New Zealand, with an Auckland housing crisis similar to Vancouver’s, is considerin­g a program to establish annual house price to income goals, and automatica­lly ease developmen­t rules if they are not met. This could be a model for Calgary and Edmonton to follow.

Housing affordabil­ity is important not only to people, but also to the economy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada