Edmonton Journal

Dentist denies responsibi­lity for four-year-old’s brain injury

- KEITH GEREIN kgerein@postmedia.com twitter.com/ keithgerei­n

An Edmonton dentist at the centre of a $26-million lawsuit has filed documents with the court denying responsibi­lity for any brain injuries sustained by a four-year-old girl who received dental work under general anesthesia in his office last year.

In a joint statement of defence filed March 9, dentist William R. Mather and dental assistant Kim Kandora-Couvreur reject that they were negligent or breached any duty of care toward patient Amber Athwal.

“The (tooth) extraction­s and administra­tion of anesthesia were of a routine nature and the extraction­s proceeded without complicati­on,” the statement says. “Dr. Mather and Kim provided timely, proper, compassion­ate and appropriat­e care.”

If any negligence was at play, the statement says, the girl’s parents “are guilty of a substantia­l degree of contributo­ry negligence” for failing to disclose accurate informatio­n on Amber’s medical history or her food consumptio­n in the hours before the dental procedure.

Since Mather and Kandora-Couvreur provided proper care, any injuries suffered by the girl were at least partly caused by a pre-existing medical or dental condition, or negligence from other staff in the office, the statement says.

The statement of claim filed by Amber’s family on Feb. 10 names several defendants — Mather, Kandora-Couvreur, registered nurse Tasneem Ali, an unnamed dentist and five unnamed female staff members.

Ali has filed her own statement of defence maintainin­g that her care of Amber was “at all times reasonable, skilful, careful and proper.”

None of the allegation­s cited in the statement of claim or statements of defence have been proven in court.

The court action stems from an incident at Mather’s downtown dentaloffi­cethatoccu­rredonSept.7 last year.

According to the statement of claim, Athwal and her family had an appointmen­t at Mather’s office that morning for what they believed was only a preliminar­y examinatio­n and consultati­on. Instead, Mather told them he could perform Amber’s procedure later that morning due to a last-minute cancellati­on.

The statement says Mather asked if Amber had eaten that day — a factor in how medical sedation is handled — and was told she had consumed bread and milk.

Amber was then put under general anesthesia and the hour-long procedure was finished just before noon.

The lawsuit alleges that around 12:15 p.m., Amber was in recovery when Ali noticed she was not breathing and did not have a heartbeat.

The statement says KandoraCou­vreur did not call Emergency Medical Services until approximat­ely 12:30 p.m. and that none of the defendants were making any efforts to provide proper ventilatio­n for Amber at the time paramedics arrived.

The girl suffered a brain injury due to lack of oxygen.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada