Edmonton Journal

Senators vote to block tanker moratorium bill

- Jess e Snyder

In a rare legislativ­e move on Wednesday, the Senate transport committee voted to defeat the Liberal government’s moratorium on oil tankers in northern B.C., putting the controvers­ial bill on life support after years of political wrangling.

A vote against the bill by Independen­t Sen. Paula Simons, along with the five other Conservati­ve senators on the committee, swayed a final decision in favour of recommendi­ng that the senate nix Bill C-48, which effectivel­y bars any oil tankers from entering northern B.C. waters.

The move does not immediatel­y kill the oil tanker moratorium, but a vote by the senate to adopt the committee recommenda­tions would stop the legislatio­n in its tracks. A vote on the report is expected in the coming days.

A decision to strike down the bill would provide major relief for oil and gas interest groups, the Alberta government, and some First Nations communitie­s, who have been intensely opposed to the legislatio­n.

Opponents of the bill said it unfairly discrimina­ted against oil pipelines that aimed to ship oil from ports along the northern B.C. coast, and even targeted Aboriginal communitie­s who wished to capitalize from natural resource developmen­t.

A failure in the oil and gas sector to build major oil pipelines in recent years has helped stoke deep angst in Alberta, seeding distrust over Ottawa’s stated plans to introduce policies that supported both the economy and the environmen­t.

Simons said she decided to vote down the bill after the committee failed to accept a number of amendments that would have struck a more equal balance between competing environmen­tal and industrial interests.

One of the most prominent voices against C-48 is Calvin Helin, the CEO of Eagle Spirit Energy Holding, an Aboriginal-led group that has sketched out plans to build a roughly $18-billion oil pipeline from northern Alberta to Prince Rupert, B.C. The group had lobbied the federal government to shelve Bill C-48, and formed a coalition of First Nations groups that vocally contested the legislatio­n during a December tour in Ottawa.

Bill C-48 was introduced as part of a promise by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when he approved the Trans Mountain and Keystone XL pipelines, under the condition that a moratorium on oil tanker traffic be placed on northern B.C. Trudeau also rejected the Northern Gateway project, which would have cut through the region the tanker ban would protect.

Some coastal First Nations and environmen­tal groups argue that oil shippers cannot yet guarantee they could fully clean up a spill in ocean waters, making transport of crude oil too risky.

The looming vote on C-48 also comes as the senate energy committee prepares a line-by-line study Thursday morning of Bill C-69, another oil and gas-related piece of legislatio­n that has drawn the ire of Western provinces.

Senators have proposed hundreds of amendments to Bill C-69, which would overhaul the review process for major oil projects like oil refineries and nuclear plants. It has been intensely opposed by government­s in Alberta, Saskatchew­an and Newfoundla­nd, as well as industry groups.

Senators also proposed deep and structural amendments to Bill C-48, including the designatio­n of a specific shipping channel, or “corridor,” to Prince Rupert that would allow for oil tankers to move through — a proposal roundly rejected by environmen­talists and some coastal First Nations, who supported the ban.

Transport Minister Marc Garneau told committee members on Tuesday that he was open to amendments to the bill, but rejected any suggestion­s of an exempted shipping channel.

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney has also heavily criticized Bill C-48, and has threatened to launch a constituti­onal challenge against Ottawa if it refuses to shelve legislatio­n that he says will destroy the Canadian natural resources sector.

Some experts who testified during hearings on Bill C-48 said legislator­s could better protect Canadian coasts from oil spills by simply adopting more internatio­nal safety standards, which place stricter regulation­s on shippers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada