Edmonton Journal

Infrastruc­ture legislatio­n to be released next spring

- EMMA GRANEY

Legislatio­n to govern infrastruc­ture funding — including transparen­cy around who gets what — will be introduced next spring, Postmedia has learned.

Municipali­ties have not yet been contacted for input, but say it’s critical they help develop the plan.

An Alberta Infrastruc­ture Act was part of the UCP election platform.

It was sold as a way to be more open about prioritiza­tion criteria, establish predictabl­e funding levels and ensure adequate maintenanc­e of existing assets.

The party also promised a 20year strategic capital plan.

Infrastruc­ture Minister Prasad Panda was not made available for an interview, but his press secretary Diane Carter said the plan will be developed over the next year.

She said it will be guided by the pending Mackinnon report into Alberta’s finances and the planned Infrastruc­ture Act.

Infrastruc­ture funding is consistent­ly top of mind for municipali­ties as they pursue reliable provincial cash flows to help build a plethora of projects.

Municipal infrastruc­ture support comprised the bulk of the capital plan in the former NDP government’s 2018 budget, taking 25 per cent of the funding pie.

Next came capital maintenanc­e and renewal (19 per cent), health facilities and equipment (17 per cent), and roads and bridges (12 per cent). The government also included a list of unfunded projects across the province.

Alberta Urban Municipali­ties Associatio­n president and Brooks Mayor Barry Morishita said consultati­ons will be key in developing a workable piece of legislatio­n.

More than 60 per cent of provincial infrastruc­ture is in municipali­ties, he said, “so it makes sense for us to have a significan­t amount of input into how the plans are figured out.”

A big piece of that is transparen­cy. Without it, he said, long-term planning becomes tough.

Morishita cited an example in his own city, which has been trying for years to build a wastewater project. Despite spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on appropriat­e engineerin­g drawings, it’s still twiddling its thumbs as it waits for word on funding.

“To avoid those kinds of things we think transparen­cy is really important, because if we were 53 on the list of priorities, we’d perhaps not spend that money until we were closer to the top 10 or 20,” he said.

Morishita said it’s crucial the province listen to municipali­ties when it comes to prioritizi­ng infrastruc­ture projects.

“We’d like to be at the table.” For the City of Edmonton, priority No. 1 is preserving the funding model secured in Bill 32 last year following a long-fought battle.

That agreement saw cash for Edmonton and Calgary linked to provincial revenues, with $500 million to be split between them come 2022-23 when the current revenue sharing plan expires.

Mayor Don Iveson wasn’t available to speak to what he’d like to see in the proposed Infrastruc­ture Act, but spokespers­on Cheryl Oxford said the city must have input.

“Infrastruc­ture is definitely one of our priorities, so it would be important (for the province) to engage with City of Edmonton in any of their consultati­ons or planning prior to finalizing any legislatio­n.”

That hasn’t happened yet, but Oxford said the city would be happy to give its two cents in terms of infrastruc­ture needs from a strategic planning perspectiv­e.

Carter said the government hasn’t yet finalized an engagement plan with municipali­ties, but it’s part of the ongoing work for the ministry as it develops the new act.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada