Edmonton Journal

Astros fire assistant GM, apologize to female reporter

- SCOTT STINSON sstinson@postmedia.com

WASHINGTON Mere days after accusing a Sports Illustrate­d reporter of fabricatin­g details of a story in which Houston assistant GM Brandon Taubman yelled support for Astros closer Roberto Osuna directly at a female reporter who had been critical of the pitcher, the Astros have fired the executive and apologized.

“Our initial investigat­ion led us to believe the inappropri­ate comments … were not directed to any specific reporter,” said a statement from the team. “We were wrong.”

The team apologized to the reporter, Stephanie Apstein, whose report it initially characteri­zed as “misleading and completely irresponsi­ble.”

Taubman, after the Astros won the ALCS, shouted “Thank God we got Osuna! I’m so (expletive) glad we got Osuna!” several times in the direction of three female reporters in the clubhouse. One of them had written critically of the Astros’ decision to acquire Osuna from the Toronto Blue Jays last year. He was serving a 75-game suspension at the time. Accused of attacking the mother of his child in Toronto, charges were dropped when the woman, who had gone home to Mexico, said she wouldn’t take part in any prosecutio­n.

Taubman originally insisted he was merely showing support for Osuna in the face of tough questions. The Houston closer had blown a save in the ninth inning of Game 6, which the Astros went on to win.

Jeff Luhnow, Houston’s GM, addressed the whole affair at Nationals Park on Thursday night, and it was like trying to douse a fire with gasoline.

“It was wrong and we own it as an organizati­on,” he said of the initial response to Apstein’s story.

But asked who signed off on a statement that essentiall­y called Sports Illustrate­d a fraud, Luhnow meekly offered that he wasn’t “going to get into the details.”

After another regular season in which analytical­ly minded teams and coaches have generally eschewed quaint notions like the bunt, small ball is making a comeback in the post-season.

In the seventh-inning of

Game 2 of the World Series, with the Nationals up by just a run, Washington manager Dave Martinez ordered Adam Eaton to drop down a bunt with runners at first and second. Eaton did so, the runners advanced, and then Houston manager A.J. Hinch called for an intentiona­l walk to Juan Soto to load the bases.

All of a sudden it was the 1980s again, when it was possible for something other than a walk, strikeout or home run to happen during an at-bat.

It was the first time all season that Hinch had called for an intentiona­l pass, a sign of how much baseball thinking has changed — baserunner­s are to be prevented in all but the most extreme circumstan­ces.

Soto, who is mashing during these playoffs, was just such a circumstan­ce.

“I’ve watched Soto, just like you have,” Hinch said when asked why he put Soto on base, where he would eventually be one of six Nats to score in an inning that blew Game 2 open.

That big seventh-inning rally included a bunch of two-strike hits, something that’s been a huge part of Washington’s eightgame playoff winning streak. Again, that’s something that runs counter to recent baseball trends, where record strikeout totals have been posted in each of the past two seasons. It has become common wisdom that strikeouts are just outs, but don’t tell Martinez that.

“I’m not a fan of strikeouts,” he said on Thursday at Nationals Park. “We talked about it and I wanted these guys to understand that putting the ball in play with two strikes, regardless if you get a hit or not, is huge because anything can happen. The only thing that happens when you strike out is you put your head down, you walk to the dugout and put your bat in the bat rack. That doesn’t do anybody good.”

The Nationals had the fourth-fewest strikeouts in the majors this past season. The Astros had the fewest.

The record home run totals of 2019 were due at least in part to a much livelier baseball.

This wasn’t just a conspiracy theory put forward by beleaguere­d pitchers, but one supported by actual science: the ball is smoother, with lower seams, which led to reduced drag on it and therefore a longer flight.

MLB has convened panels to study how this happened. But the balls thrown (and hit) in the post-season have been shown to have more resistance in the air — more drag, that is — leading to questions whether MLB decided to de-juice the pellets.

Commission­er Rob Manfred is having none of it:

“I can tell you one thing for absolute certain,” he said before the series shifted to Washington. “Just like every other year, the baseballs that were used in the post-season were selected from lots that were used in the regular season. There was no difference in those baseballs.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada