Edmonton Journal

Not so boldly

Results mixed as Star Trek: Lower Decks expands Gene Roddenberr­y’s universe

- DANIEL D’ADDARIO Variety.com

Star Trek: Lower Decks Thursdays, CTV Sci-fi Channel

Star Trek: Lower Decks, the latest series in the franchise Gene Roddenberr­y launched in 1966, doesn’t take place on the Enterprise, or the Voyager, or any of the similarly inspiringl­y named ships in the fleet.

This animated show depicts the comings and goings of the support staff on the U.S.S. Cerritos, a ship sharing its name with a small city within Los Angeles County. It’s a signal of this show’s small-scale ambitions compared to recent dramas Discovery and Picard — to amuse prosaicall­y, to stay close to the Earth rather than soar.

In returning to a place CBS

All Access has gone before twice in recent memory, the most surprising choice Lower Decks makes is to do so without much boldness. (In Canada, the show airs on the CTV Sci-fi Channel.)

The show focuses on a core group of four characters, all of whose adventures tend toward the small-scale, easily resolved and cute, if slightly more edgy than Roddenberr­y might have envisioned.

The series’ cold open, in which Beckett Mariner (Tawny Newsome), drunk on Romulan whiskey, mocks her fellow ensign Brad Boimler (Jack Quaid) for making a captain’s log is somewhat emblematic of the show’s goof-off tone.

These aren’t your grandpa’s Starfleet ensigns, with all their idealism. They’re characters for whom trying is a little embarrassi­ng. (As Brad’s log points out, this team specialize­s in “second contact” — mainly pushing paperwork.) The point is driven home moments later when he’s accidental­ly stabbed in the leg.

This is a comic universe populated by the slacker

Beckett, the rigid Brad, the dreamy D’vana Tendi (Noël Wells) and the cybernetic­ally enhanced Sam Rutherford (Eugene Cordero); their adventures have a looseness that can be appealing.

And Star Trek’s willingnes­s to play with its brand in this way — lending an intellectu­al property about valiant questing to Rick and Morty vet Mike Mcmahan, to re-engineer as a comedy about the marginal — is admirable. It calls to mind, perhaps, the adventurou­sness that brought The Mandaloria­n to Disney+.

But the comparison stops there: The Mandaloria­n is aiming to excite, thrill and enthrall, and Lower Decks simply to amuse; it also, in tossing aside the Trek earnestnes­s, does somewhat torch that which makes the franchise special in the first place.

Its first four episodes contain some laughs and some elegantly done character work.

But if the joke of Lower Decks is that its characters, on a random ship doing cleanup work somewhere in the galaxy, fall short of demanding a show about their adventures, it’s not hard to agree.

 ?? CBS INTERACTIV­E ?? Star Trek: Lower Decks puts limitation­s on its ambitions, which are simply to amuse and entertain — and it works.
CBS INTERACTIV­E Star Trek: Lower Decks puts limitation­s on its ambitions, which are simply to amuse and entertain — and it works.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada