Edmonton Journal

Saskatchew­an Drive can be rebuilt to make it cheaper, safer

We know one-lane model works, says Stephen Raitz.

- Stephen Raitz is chair of Paths for People.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has created major fiscal shortfalls for the City of Edmonton. We have an idea to help meet this challenge: Rebuild Saskatchew­an Drive between 104 Street and 109 Street for short- and longterm savings.

The city plans to rehabilita­te Saskatchew­an Drive over the coming years, replacing the current road with a similar but upgraded design. The first piece of this rehabilita­tion will occur with the replacemen­t of the Duggan Bridge (which is between 108 Street and 106 Street along Saskatchew­an Drive). The bridge replacemen­t is planned and funded for completion over the next few years.

If the city is serious about finding new cost savings, Duggan Bridge and Saskatchew­an Drive should be rebuilt to serve only one driving lane. This will reduce the amount of infrastruc­ture built, decreasing constructi­on and future maintenanc­e costs.

It will also eliminate the need to build an expensive cantilever­ed structure for cyclists and pedestrian­s, which is planned to jut out over the river valley at Saskatchew­an and 105 Street. All we need is a simple shared use-path that's wide enough to ensure that everyone walking, biking, scooting, or using other mobility devices along the corridor can do so safely.

As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the city reallocate­d space along this same portion of Saskatchew­an Drive. It changed the north eastbound vehicle lane into an expansion of the multi-use path. The south eastbound vehicle lane remained, as did the street parking.

Edmontonia­ns got a glimpse into what Saskatchew­an Drive can truly be. The posted speed limit of 40 km/ h made the street safer for all Edmontonia­ns. Crossing one lane of vehicle traffic, as opposed to two lanes, made the area

Edmontonia­ns flocked to the street for socially distant walks and a breath of fresh air.

more accessible for folks with limited mobility. The reclaimed portion of the roadway was filled with cyclists, scooters, pedestrian­s, and other active road users. Edmontonia­ns flocked to the street for socially distant walks and a breath of fresh air. The narrowed roadway still conveyed significan­t traffic volumes without delays.

Former board member with Paths for People and transporta­tion engineer Marcel Huculak has developed a report that studies the potential redesign of this corridor for one lane of vehicle traffic, as opposed to the proposed two lanes. This approach would not increase congestion for vehicles in the long term. It balances the needs of vehicles and people getting around and ensures safety for all users.

The experience Edmontonia­ns had along this street during this spring, summer and fall indicate that we can rebuild Duggan Bridge and Saskatchew­an Drive for short-term and longterm savings. The report we created affirms this and envisions a design for the roadway that mitigates concerns around traffic congestion, while also creating a safer street.

Saskatchew­an Drive is emblematic of the broader decisions we need to make as a city to adjust for the repercussi­ons of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Finding ways to save does not mean that we need to cut and slash projects. We need to reimagine how we do things as a city to grow and renew ourselves more efficientl­y and sustainabl­y.

Building Saskatchew­an Drive between

104 Street and 109 Street for one lane of traffic is a great example of how we can reimagine how our city works to create savings. It still provides the capacity required for vehicle, transit, and active transporta­tion traffic. This also creates a safer and more livable street for all Edmontonia­ns to enjoy.

Paths for People is excited to offer this winwin solution as a means to create savings and a safer street. The city may say it's too late to change the project. But it wasn't too late to roll back the e-bike grant. That decision saved $100,000. This decision, to narrow the road and bridge, would save even more.

And in the interim, can't we keep the pylons up? That barely costs anything at all.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada