U.S. top court alters argument free-for-all
INTERRUPTIONS
WASHINGTON • The U.S. Supreme Court has changed its discussion format because female justices were being interrupted by their male peers, one of its members has revealed.
An institution steeped in tradition, the court's customary practice had been to allow a free-for-all questioning session by its nine justices during oral arguments.
But when the panel returned for in-person oral arguments at the start of the new term this month, it announced a surprise change: each justice would be allocated a time for uninterrupted questioning.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the court's three female justices, has revealed the change was inspired in large part by studies that found female justices in the Supreme Court faced more interruptions by male justices and lawyers.
Speaking at an event at New York University's law school on Wednesday, she said the issue had prompted the chief justice, John Roberts, to become “much more sensitive” to the issue and to act as referee if needed.
Sotomayor said the studies, including one by Northwestern University's Law school, have had an “enormous impact” on the court's workings.
The 2017 study by Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers noted that interactions during oral arguments were “highly gendered” and women were interrupted at a “disproportionate rate” to that of their male colleagues.
The study also noted that female justices had learned, over time, how to behave more like their male peers “in order to reduce the extent to which they are dominated by the men.”
Sotomayor alluded to this in her remarks this week, saying that she had “without question” noticed such a pattern of behaviour since being appointed in 2009 and felt forced to respond accordingly.
“I interrupt back,” she said at the event, according to CNN. She added that the pattern of behaviour was reflected in wider society. “Most of the time women say things and they are not heard in the same way as men who might say the identical thing,” she said.
The new format combines the traditional free-for-all questioning with a round of individual questions by each justice in order of seniority and was trialled during the pandemic, when the court moved online.
No strict time limit applies to this new segment, but so far the justices have not cut each other off.
The strength of the system will no doubt be tested as America's highest court turns its attention to a number of politically charged cases, including abortion and gun rights.
It is not just the female justices who appear to be benefiting from the new system — Justice Clarence Thomas, known for his silence in courtrooms, has started to participate more.