Edmonton Journal

PLENTY OF UNCERTAINT­Y

A lack of elite prospects makes it difficult to predict what will happen at the NFL draft

- JOHN KRYK jokryk@postmedia.com twitter: @Johnkryk

Everybody is guessing — more than even usual.

No one, outside of maybe a handful of Jacksonvil­le Jaguars leaders, knows which player they'll take as the NFL'S No. 1 overall pick on Thursday night.

Similarly, who knows who'll comprise the top five overall picks of the draft — or even, within a five-pick window, where the first quarterbac­k will be selected?

There's that much uncertaint­y surroundin­g the 2022 NFL draft.

As much as ever, guessing games permeate virtually all pre-draft discussion, speculatio­n and reporting, as reflected in the ever-growing avalanche of discordant mock drafts — which this year are like your office's March Madness bracket submission­s, with picks all over the map and no two remotely alike.

The NFL draft kicks off Thursday night in Las Vegas at 8 p.m. EDT with Round 1. It continues Friday starting at 7 p.m. EDT (Rounds 2-3) before concluding Saturday (Rounds 4-7) starting at noon EDT. TSN (via ESPN), ABC and NFL Network will all provide live TV coverage.

You'd think University of Michigan pass rusher Aidan Hutchinson would be the best bet to go No. 1 overall to the Jaguars, shortly after NFL commission­er Roger Goodell pretends again to revel in being booed off the draft stage. That's because Hutchinson was a rare defensive Heisman Trophy finalist last year in NCAA football's top division. He still sits atop most media experts' mock drafts.

Since January, most money was placed on Hutchinson going No. 1 overall. But last week, University of Georgia pass rusher Travon Walker supplanted Hutchinson as the odds-on favourite.

To give you a sense of how tightly packed the top talent is this year among incoming ex-collegians, Cbssports.com draft expert Chris Trapasso lists Walker as the No. 45 prospect in his top 300.

Why so much discrepanc­y this year, so much uncertaint­y?

Because so many top prospects lack something important. Experience. Or size. Or football IQ. Or reliable desire. Or some on-field trait required of someone rated among the top two or three at his position. Indeed, if there is a consensus about this year's draft it's that — by all the various player-grading systems embraced by team talent evaluators or media experts alike — there's a dearth of overall elite prospects.

Reports over the past week cited unnamed NFL GMS as stating there might be no more than 15 legit first-round players up for grabs. The elite talent shortfall is especially glaring in the 2022 quarterbac­k class.

All that is why some are predicting there might well be more teams this year hoping to trade down from the first half of Round 1, than trade up to it.

And why not trade down? If there's that much uncertaint­y, then turning one pick in the top 32 into, say, two picks in the top 40 might be far more prudent.

So why not this year just maximize your number of picks and, say, take two early on at a position of need to increase your odds that one will pan out?

NFL Network's top draft analyst Daniel Jeremiah said “there's a lot of truth” to volume picking.

“Every draft has some players that come in clear packaging, where I feel like you know exactly what you're getting,” Jeremiah said. “There's not a lot of them, and I'm not saying they're all the best players, but some of them are just more clearly defined than everybody else.

“Outside of that, with the vast majority of these players, it's going to be largely dependent on where they go, how they're used, how they're coached, who they're with. I think there is a lot of logic behind trying to get as many bites at the apple as you can, or using those resources to try and find those clear-packaging players.”

As for individual positions, we all like to start with the most success-dependent position in pro sports: quarterbac­k. And either Kenny Pickett of the University of Pittsburgh or

Malik Willis of Liberty University is universall­y expected to be the first passer picked. In most years, though, neither would be ranked so high at his position.

Pickett is seen as someone who's ready to play, fresh out of the box, but both his arm and accuracy wow no one.

Willis is sort of the opposite, a raw pro prospect who possesses a drool-worthy gun of an arm, with so much growth potential his ceiling might require a sniper's binoculars even to be seen. But Willis, too, isn't as accurate as any team typically wants in a top QB pick.

Chad Reuter of Nfl.com foresees Pickett going No. 2 overall to the Detroit Lions, while Mel Kiper Jr. of ESPN doesn't believe Pickett will even go in the top

10. Trapasso of Cbssports.com rates Pickett 14th overall.

Willis might well be snared within the first 10 picks, but

Pete Prisco of Cbssports.com is adamant the 22-year-old is a pure project — a second-round pick at best.

Other than edge rusher — with Hutchinson, Walker and University of Oregon's Kayvon Thibodeaux all expected to be gone by the sixth pick, if not even 1-2-3 to start Thursday night (in whatever order) — many other positions, not just quarterbac­k, offer few consensus No. 1 prospects.

As many as three offensive tackles could go within the first 10 selections, but in what order? Some rate University of Alabama's Evan Neal the best. Others, North Carolina State's Ikem (Ickey) Ekwonu. Charles Cross of Mississipp­i State is deemed the No. 3 OT.

NFL Network's Jeremiah said this of the No. 1 OT debate, which underscore­s the one-glaringthi­ng-missing issue this year:

“I like Ekwonu. I know teams around the league are a little split around him because he's kind of raw in pass pro(tection). But it's all there. It's all in his body. He's a dominant, dominant run blocker who I think has some inside/outside ability.”

Among defensive backs,

Notre Dame's Kyle Hamilton is viewed as one of the most impressive safety prospects in years. He's even the No. 1 overall talent, according to Trapasso of Cbssports.com. Hamilton is fast, fierce and huge for a safety, and a couple months ago was a top-10 lock in many top mocks. But he ran slow 40-yard-dash times at his pro day; if he goes at all in the top 10 now, probably it'd be late, in the 8-10 range.

But again, who knows. At cornerback, Ahmad (Sauce) Gardner of the University of Cincinnati is seen by most as best, although some award that honour to LSU'S Derek Stingley Jr., with Matt Miller of ESPN. com even predicting Stingley will go No. 3 overall.

As for wide receiver, it's another deep and talented class. Expect several to go in Round 1, even in the top half alone, probably starting with either Ohio State's Garrett Wilson or USC'S Drake London. That is, unless Alabama's Jameson Williams sneaks ahead.

Another highly regarded Bama Crimson Tide receiver, John Metchie III, might have been selected in Round 1 had he not torn an ACL in December. As it is, the Canadian might go as high as Round 2 or 3 on Friday night, or perhaps not until Day 3 on Saturday.

After being born in Taiwan and raised until age six in Ghana — and before attending high school in the U.S. to maximize his chances to land a football scholarshi­p at a top NCAA school — Metchie lived for eight years in Brampton, Ont.

The only other Canadian prospect this year seen to have a realistic shot at getting drafted took a similar route south of the border for high school to maximize his NCAA football value, but he's from Ottawa: Jesse Luketa, a Penn State defensive lineman. He's seen as a likely Round 4-7 pick.

Metchie and Luketa, in that order, are rated as the top two prospects in the CFL Scouting Bureau's top 22 rankings.

A few others either born or raised in Canada might get an offer to sign with an NFL team shortly following the draft's conclusion Saturday night, as what's called a priority free agent, or get an offer merely to try out at an NFL team's rookie camp.

One might be Syracuse linebacker Tyrell Richards, from Brampton, the No. 3 CFL draft prospect. Or possibly the No. 11 CFL prospect, Louisiana Tech wide receiver Samuel Emilus of Montreal.

For a sense at the uphill climb facing many hoping to land an offer as an undrafted free agent, Emilus is rated the No. 189 linebacker by Dane Brugler of Theathleti­c.com, when he has draft grades on only 35.

University of Waterloo quarterbac­k Tre Ford of Niagara

Falls, Ont., is the fastest QB (4.46 seconds in the 40) of any of the 63 quarterbac­ks Brugler ranks for this year's NFL draft. Brugler ranks Ford as the No. 54 QB.

Might Ford's speed enable him to get a chance at some NFL team's camp to try out, say, at slot receiver? Former New England Patriots wideout great Julian Edelman played strictly QB in college, after all. But Ford would have to have the inclinatio­n to switch positions, plus the hands, WR instincts and most of all the ability to translate his great in-line speed into short-area burst and quickness.

As a QB, Ford is the CFL draft's No. 4 prospect.

Western University's Deionte Knight is another Canadian with a possible post-draft, free-agent shot. Brugler ranks Knight as the No. 83 edge rusher, where Brugler has assigned only 32 with a draft grade.

 ?? HYOSUB SHIN/ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTI­ON/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? University of Georgia pass rusher Travon Walker is another favourite to go No. 1 overall in Thursday's NFL draft, but not everyone agrees.
HYOSUB SHIN/ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTI­ON/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES University of Georgia pass rusher Travon Walker is another favourite to go No. 1 overall in Thursday's NFL draft, but not everyone agrees.
 ?? DARRON CUMMINGS/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? University of Michigan pass rusher Aidan Hutchinson, a Heisman Trophy finalist, sits atop most pundits' mock drafts.
DARRON CUMMINGS/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES University of Michigan pass rusher Aidan Hutchinson, a Heisman Trophy finalist, sits atop most pundits' mock drafts.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada