Edmonton Journal

Cleaner indoor air would mean far less illness

We should be investing in filtration, ventilatio­n and germicidal lighting

- BLAKE MURDOCH Blake Murdoch is a science communicat­or and senior research associate with the Health Law Institute at the University of Alberta.

On Feb. 11, 2020, World Health Organizati­on Director- General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesu­s openly stated that the new coronaviru­s was airborne.

His colleague Dr. Michael Ryan then whispered to him and showed him a note. A few minutes later, Dr. Tedros retracted his statement, calling the term airborne “military language” and saying the virus spreads by “droplets.”

Some countries recognized the novel coronaviru­s seemed to stay suspended in the air like smoke. Yet, the WHO and much of the world did not. On March 28, 2020, the WHO infamously tweeted “Fact Check: COVID-19 is NOT airborne.”

It was later reported that aerosol physicists were essentiall­y ignored in favour of medical dogma when attempting to advise the WHO at the start of the pandemic. Many lives would have been saved had public health institutio­ns focused on mitigating airborne transmissi­on.

Over four years later, things are changing. The WHO now finally and fully recognizes at the institutio­nal level that COVID-19 is airborne, and has made one of the world's top aerosol scientists co-chair of its new indoor air advisory group.

The WHO also collaborat­ed with particle physicists to develop ARIA, the Airborne Risk Indoor Assessment tool, which models risk of infection for different types of buildings and settings to help us understand how to make indoor air clean.

This key tool can be world-changing if used properly, and I'll explain why.

First, cleaning indoor air mitigates all airborne diseases at the same time without requiring changes to individual behaviour. Several diseases that cause us repeated suffering and fill our hospitals are airborne, including COVID-19, influenza, RSV and tuberculos­is.

Second, cleaning indoor air will help prevent future pandemics. Viruses that cause a global emergency are quite likely to be airborne, because those kinds of pathogens typically spread more easily. After all, the average person breathes around 11,000 litres of air per day. Plus, many countries already have clean water, essentiall­y eliminatin­g water-borne pandemics.

We no longer get cholera, and we no longer have to get influenza, either.

Third, when clean indoor air reduces the spread of disease, fewer people in any given indoor space are contagious than before, further reducing transmissi­on.

This creates a beneficial feedback loop. The gains in disease prevention compound to much greater benefits, like money you invest over decades.

But because the life cycle from infection to transmissi­on is short, the compoundin­g benefits happen much faster — they can begin within weeks.

This can result in “exponentia­l decay.” When each infected person infects less than one other person on average, a disease starts to organicall­y disappear, becoming more and more rare.

Exponentia­l decay can even lead to eradicatio­n. This has happened recently. Public health measures during the first few years of the pandemic led to the extinction of the entire Yamagata B lineage of the influenza family tree. Now it's being removed from all future flu vaccine formulatio­ns.

With investment­s in indoor air quality, we can control every airborne disease.

Imagine telling parents with school-aged children who are constantly sick that just changing the building code will make their kids far healthier. This is obviously what they want, and it will also prevent post-viral chronic illnesses like long COVID.

I'm not sure parents understand this is currently possible. As a result, unnecessar­y disease is socially normalized as a rite of passage to help families cope.

But life can be much better than that.

Ventilatio­n, filtration and germicidal lighting such as Far-UV and upper-room UV are the three main existing technologi­es that can make our buildings healthy.

We should be spending millions, even billions, on this endeavour. It will be the largest improvemen­t in human hygiene since the advent of water treatment. It will reap huge economic benefits by greatly reducing short- and long-term illness, and will depressuri­ze hospitals. Clean indoor air will also protect against harmful pollution and help us adapt to climate change, as those who have breathed wildfire smoke know well.

Now we just need bureaucrac­y to take a back seat to scientists and engineers so they can get on with making life better for everyone.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada