Edmonton Journal

Latest tax hike has nothing to do with bike lanes

City is picking up province's slack, Shannon Lohner says.

- Shannon Lohner is the chair of Paths for People, a non-profit organizati­on dedicated to making the city a friendlier place to walk, roll and cycle.

The City of Edmonton has been struck by another unfortunat­e proposed property tax hike of 8.7 per cent, up from the 6.6 per cent approved by city council last fall.

Every time tax increases are proposed, the Active Transporta­tion Network Expansion funding comes under fire: “Why are we spending $100 million on bike lanes when our property taxes continue to increase?”

Ultimately, this property tax hike is not caused by our investment­s in active transporta­tion infrastruc­ture.

When we talk about this further 2.1 per cent increase, we should focus on the facts. Property taxes are again proposed to increase primarily due to increased workers compensati­on board premiums, inflation (and increased labour costs due to union settlement­s), rapid population growth and massive reductions in provincial funding.

The $100 million for Active Transporta­tion Network Expansion (otherwise known as crosswalks, shared-use paths and bike lanes) contribute­s roughly 0.02 per cent to the 2024 operating budget. Since this is a massive infrastruc­ture project, it is funded through the capital budget, and this spring budget adjustment focuses specifical­ly on the operating budget.

Cancelling our $100-million investment in active transporta­tion infrastruc­ture would have next to no effect on this property tax increase, as it is funded through debt servicing and the costs are split over decades. People deserve access to amenities and infrastruc­ture within their communitie­s, and an effective, citywide active transporta­tion network is a key piece of that puzzle.

Edmonton's population is rapidly growing. We've had 100,000 people move here since 2021 alone. With the equivalent of the entirety of

Red Deer moving into our city, we need to prioritize fiscally responsibl­e methods of mobility so Edmontonia­ns can easily move around their city.

That means investing in infrastruc­ture that moves people, whether that's people moving in cars, via transit, on bikes or on their own two feet. Our investment­s should reflect the city we want to become, and with the city identifyin­g a target of 50 per cent of trips taken by active transporta­tion and transit as we expand to two million people, we need to invest in the infrastruc­ture required to make this possible.

We will continue to advocate for proportion­ally expanding funding for active transporta­tion and transit infrastruc­ture, since this supports building a city that provides more accessible and sustainabl­e transporta­tion options.

Additional­ly, provincial infrastruc­ture funding has plummeted since 2011, and municipali­ties are receiving less funding per capita even though our population continues to skyrocket. With less funding and more people to serve, we need to prioritize low-cost and high-impact improvemen­ts to our city, such as main street renewals or fixing missing links in our sidewalk network. Not building massive highways or overpasses.

Roads and mobility infrastruc­ture are a service in which municipali­ties should be investing. They are, by definition, local. That is what property taxes are designed to go toward, and yet Edmonton has been forced to pick up the slack on downloaded provincial responsibi­lities such as homelessne­ss, public health and intermunic­ipal highways.

So remember, when you see a further two per cent increase in your property taxes, it's not because of bike lanes. Building roads, including bike lanes, is part of a municipali­ty's core mandate. It's just the cost of what they do.

The increase is an additional two per cent because municipali­ties are being put in a vise due to limited revenue generation and increasing responsibi­lities. Change is hard, but it's needed now to support our growth into a fiscally responsibl­e city through cheaper ways to move around our community.

We need to prioritize low-cost and high-impact improvemen­ts to our city.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada