Exclaim!

“I long for the day when we make this movie irrelevant.”

The Coup’s Boots Riley Makes His Directoria­l Debut

- By Josiah Hughes

SORRY TO BOTHER YOU, THE FEATURE DIRECTORIA­L DEBUT FROM ACTIVIST, WRITER AND DIRECTOR BOOTS RILEY — co-founder of the hip-hop group the Coup — is a bold, brash air siren that flips off the status quo and demands more from its viewers. It’s a socio-political marvel, the kind of viewing experience that feels at once surreal and a little too real, provoking serious thoughts about race, late capitalism and the seeming hopelessne­ss of contempora­ry mainstream activism. Above all, however, it’s funny as hell.

“That’s the way I talk. That’s the way I tell stories. That’s the way I make music,” Riley says. “I didn’t know that the Coup was known for humour until someone said, ‘Yeah, you’re good at that funny shit.’ I was like, ‘I am?’ I didn’t even know. Because comedy — a lot of it — is focused on irony and contradict­ion, which are very related to each other as well. Contradict­ion, and exposing contradict­ion, is what political analysis is.”

In Sorry to Bother You, Lakeith Stanfield stars as Cassius Green, an aimless young adult longing to achieve significan­ce the way his girlfriend Detroit (Tessa Thompson) has in the art world. Employed as a telemarket­er, he eventually unlocks his “white voice” — an exaggerate­d, nasal dork cadence dubbed in by David Cross. From there, he leaves his peers behind as he climbs the corporate ladder, eventually uncovering a sinister (and absolutely absurd) plan from a try-hard billionair­e (too perfect Armie Hammer). From there, Cassius faces the age-old decision — should he embrace labour solidarity or sell out in favour of corporate solitude?

Riley’s comedic sensibilit­ies shine through every jaw-dropping second, from the crackling dialogue and absurd situations to endless sight gags (including a stop-motion film directed by “Michel Dongry”). As a result, despite its heady socio-political themes, the film feels celebrator­y rather than cynical.

“It has an optimism that comes from having an analysis that says there is a way to change things,” Riley says. “The Coup are not like Rage Against the Machine. It’s not like, ‘We’re angry,’ you know? And that comes from me actually having been an organizer, and understand­ing what it takes for people to understand something, relate to something and feel empowered by the possibilit­ies. I never thought that anger was a gift.”

With its story of greed and corruption at odds with regular people, Sorry to Bother You is exactly the sort of project that people like to describe as “timely” or “sadly relevant.” In reality, Riley finished the screenplay in 2012 and published it in its entirety in the literary journal McSweeney’s in 2014. “It is something that was relevant at that time — it was probably relevant 30 or 40 years ago, and will also unfortunat­ely be relevant for a little while to come, until we change the way the economic system works,” he says. “I long for the day when we make this movie irrelevant.”

Of course, recent American politics have made Instagram- mable marches, online activism and shareable hashtags more popular than ever, but Sorry to Bother You points to the need for more potent protest. “Definitely, it’s not enough,” Riley says of contempora­ry online movements. “Do whatever you can at all times. But what this film points out is not just about Hollywood. It’s about how the left in general for the last 50 years has avoided class struggle.

“In reality, a lot of these problems that we’re talking about can only start to be solved when we realize where our leverage is — that our leverage is the fact that we are the ones that create the wealth, and when we collective­ly leverage that fact by withholdin­g labour,” he continues. “So the movie deals with the idea of spectacle versus material struggle. That’s what organizing has been turned into, by the organizers. We’ve misled people into believing that letting our voices be heard is what it takes to make change, when that hasn’t been historical­ly accurate. You’ve got to let your voice be heard so that the other people you want to work with know where you’re at, so you can rally together. This 50,000 people we have on the street is not just to tell you we don’t like something. We are demonstrat­ing these are 50,000 people from an industry that can shut that industry down.”

With its staunch pro-union message and truly absurd sense of humour, the film would be an impressive feat from a veteran director. What’s more shocking is that this is Riley’s first feature. That said, this work has been a long time coming. The Coup got a record deal while he was attending film school at San Francisco State, so his dreams of filmmaking were absorbed into the band’s music. “We’ve got songs that are eight minutes long, because I want to tell a story,” he explains. “That was my cheap way of making movies.”

A decades-long music career also prepared Riley for the collaborat­ive process of filmmaking. “I might have the best bass player in the world, and then the drummer that thinks he’s the best drummer in the world but definitely is not, and then the crazy guitar player — I have to be the one with the vision, and I have to not just get them to fulfill the vision because I’m paying them, because then you don’t get any feeling or it doesn’t come out,” he explains. “What’s their special thing that I can get from them for that vision?

“But by that same token, I need to know that when the bass player does a lick that’s better than what I had, I have to say, ‘Wow, that’s way better — we need to go with that.’ That’s not being humble, that’s me attaching my ego to the song as opposed to the process. All of that is all of the things that are useful in film.”

Sorry to Bother You is the sort of audacious and stirring film that one would expect to be divisive. Instead, it’s received overwhelmi­ngly positive reviews. “Even if it makes people too uncomforta­ble sometimes, it’s something that is refreshing so that people welcome it,” he says. “Because it’s not the same old thing we’ve been getting. It feels like a new voice. I think the themes in it are actually way more universal than what we’ve been told that people relate to.”

“We’ve misled people into believing that letting our voices be heard is what it takes to make change. That has not been historical­ly accurate.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada