Drunk driver who was acquitted for alleged Charter breach convicted on appeal

A man found to have been driving drunk has been convicted even though the police officer who stopped him was looking for another suspected impaired driver. In a ruling setting aside two lower court decisions, Ontario’s top court ruled the traffic stop that netted Jordan Gardner was perfectly legal. “Both the (lower court judges) erred in finding that the respondent’s Charter rights had been breached,” the Court of Appeal said in its decision. “(They) further erred in excluding both the breathalyzer readings and the respondent’s statements made at the time of the police stop from the evidence.” The case arose one night in December 2015 when Const. Adrain Lieverse, an officer with the Treaty Three Police Service near Dryden, Ont., received a report that a specific person was driving a green pickup truck while impaired. Lieverse went to the suspect’s home but the person wasn’t there. Back in his cruiser, the officer spotted an oncoming vehicle but could not further identify it beyond it looking to be a pickup because of the darkness. Lieverse pulled over the truck, which turned out to be red, and Gardner was behind the wheel. According to court records, the officer asked the driver to identify himself, and said he was looking for an impaired driver. When he smelled alcohol, he asked if Gardner had been drinking and Gardner said he had been. The officer asked him to step out and gave him a breathalyzer, which Gardner failed, leading to an arrest and charge, court records show. At trial, Gardner argued the stop was illegal. Among other things, he maintained Lieverse was conducting a criminal investigation related to a different individual and so had no grounds to pull over someone unrelated.