Lethbridge Herald

MP’s points on assisted dying questioned

LETTERS

-

I commend the MP for Lethbridge, Rachael Harder, for hosting a Community Conversati­on on Physician Assisted Dying last month and I appreciate her column to the Lethbridge Herald of March 4.

However, I fail to understand this comment in her column: “The report (of the Parliament­ary Committee on Physician Assisted Dying) ignores the need for access to increased palliative care.” In fact, Recommenda­tion #19 of the report specifical­ly deals with the question of palliative care. It reads: “That Health Canada re-establish a Secretaria­t on Palliative and End-of- Life Care; and that Health Canada work with the provinces and territorie­s and civil society to develop a flexible, integrated model of palliative care by implementi­ng a panCanadia­n palliative and end-of-life strategy with dedicated funding, and developing a public awareness campaign on the topic.” What more would Ms. Harder want to see as a recommenda­tion?

On the question of mental illness, the parliament­ary committee’s report contains a detailed discussion of the difficulti­es of assessing the competency of individual­s with mental illness and their access to PAD and its Recommenda­tion #3 states “That individual­s not be excluded from eligibilit­y for medical assistance in dying based on the fact that they have a psychiatri­c condition.” I fail to understand how Ms. Harder can write in her column: “I am particular­ly concerned about allowing those with a mental illness to use their mental illness as a qualifying factor to access PAD.” She seems to have misunderst­ood that part of the report, too.

Another point in Ms. Harder’s column that needs clarificat­ion is this: “I believe the recommenda­tions of the committee, if followed, will put vulnerable Canadians, including seniors and those with disabiliti­es, at significan­t risk.” This is a blanket condemnati­on of all 21 recommenda­tions made by the parliament­ary committee, which I find to be corrosive rather than constructi­ve. For example, Recommenda­tion #21 states: “That Health Canada work with the provinces to develop a pan-Canadian strategy to improve the quality of care and services received by individual­s living with dementia, as well as their families.”

How, Ms. Harder, does that recommenda­tion put vulnerable Canadians at risk?

John Warren

Lethbridge

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada