Lethbridge Herald

Asphalt plant approved for Coaldale

Several conditions must be met for plant to be located in industrial area

- Nikki Jamieson SOUTHERN ALBERTA NEWSPAPERS — COALDALE ssnews@sunnysouth­news.com

An Asphalt Batch Plant will be coming to Coaldale’s industrial area.

Coaldale’s Municipal Planning Commission voted 3-2 last week to approve the constructi­on of the plant and ancillary gravel crusher, subject to 27 conditions.

The commission received 83 letters in regards to the asphalt plant applicatio­n, and around 90 people attended the MPC meeting in regards to the plant’s developmen­t applicatio­n.

The name of the applicant on the developmen­t applicatio­n is LASCO & Associated Companies. The owners/partners of the asphalt plant are Ground Breakers Constructi­on, J.B. Constructi­on, Leighton Kolk and associated business Infinity Paving, Silver Ridge Constructi­on and Matthew Wilson, who all have links to southern Alberta.

According to Richard Thiessen, Silver Ridge Constructi­on general manager, LASCO was started in 2016, in response to a market gap in the asphalt business. They were temporaril­y set up in Willow Creek, but sought a permanent site.

Coaldale was the first place, he said, that they applied to. The companies involved with the plant are already connected to Coaldale.

“We saw a need for a permanent site for our operations. Permanent locations lead to permanent good process,” said Thiessen during the meeting.

“The trend, especially in gravel production business, is that these sites move around from pit to pit, and it’s hard to make permanent fixes and permanent things in place, in order to handle the risk and assessment. So we want to move into a permanent site, to create good practices.”

The asphalt plant and gravel crusher will be located on the northeast corner of Coaldale, at the intersecti­on of 11 Street and 11 Avenue in the Town of Coaldale's Northeast Industrial Park. The land is zoned as industrial and Thiessen stressed they would be “a responsibl­e part of the community,” and do self-imposed monitoring in addition to regular monitoring and checks from OH&S and environmen­tal compliance officers.

During the meeting, residents on both sides of the issue were given the opportunit­y to speak. Residents raised concerns over odour, dust, decreasing property values, noise, road deteriorat­ion due to increases in heavy traffic and silica dust.

“We, of course, have to be opposed to this, because of the downwind effects we’ll take the brunt of,” said Don Kovacs, who lives adjacent to the site with his family. “Since I’ve been trying to decide the motive behind this developmen­t, the wind has been blowing from the southwest almost daily for the last two weeks. I fear that if this permit is approved, it will be like receiving a death sentence from the silica dust coming from the stockpiles and the facility when in operation.”

Those who spoke up for the plant said the asphalt plant would bring needed investment into the area. They agreed that checks and balances would be needed, but the plant will be good for the area.

“Being a seasons land developer, and having worked with Alberta Environmen­t and the town for many, many years, I am very, very aware of the rigorous controls that are in place to regulate these types of industries,” said Douglas Bergen, Coaldale land developer.

“I take comfort in the fact that we have local individual­s willing to stand at this podium and bring a multi-milliondol­lar business to our community. That has some risks, but the comfort I get from that is that these are the same people that you will meet in the aisles of the grocery store and have to look you in the eye, with regard to the accountabi­lity they have to the community and what they’re doing.”

In response to some of the concerns heard, Thiessen requested the commission make a condition of approval that there is water and they have access to water onsite. He also requested the commission make testing existing regulation­s, which are set by the province, another condition of approval.

Commission member Richard Pitsol inquired about who would be responsibl­e for land reclamatio­n, should the soil become contaminat­ed. Thiessen said asphalt was not considered to be a contaminat­e, although controls will be onsite and waste product that would be reclaimed and put back into other asphalt product.

Commission member Jose Cortes asked Thiessen to elaborate on what he meant by minimal impact. Thiessen said he “didn’t deny” that there will be impact, with the biggest impacts being with two adjacent landowners.

“There will be minimal impact, as in we will make it as little as possible, that’s all I can say,” said Thiessen. “We will continue to work in an ongoing process, to hopefully make that lessen as we go forward.”

In response to public feedback, the MPC placed two additional conditions on the plant’s approval: that a profession­ally prepared Environmen­tal Impact Assessment (EIA) be submitted and approved by the town before issuing of a developmen­t permit; and that a detailed nuisance mitigation strategy enforceabl­e by the Town be submitted and approved before issuing a developmen­t permit.

Other conditions of the approval include a dust control plan being in place and submitting a copy of their registrati­on under the Environmen­tal Protection and Enhancemen­t Act Code of Practice for Asphalt Paving Plants from Alberta Environmen­t to the Town.

Additional­ly, in response to the growth of its growing industrial park, the Town will be widening and paving 8 Street, north from Highway 3 to 10 Avenue, in 2019, and there are plans to provide a direct access from Highway 845 into the Northeast Industrial Park.

Town CAO Kalen Hastings said currently, there is a “moving target timeline” for the plant to be up and running, as all the conditions have to be met first.

“It’s going to take time for them to be able to fulfil some of the conditions attached to their permit,” said Hastings.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada