Lethbridge Herald

FBI report prompts political battle

KAVANAUGH VOTE LOOMING TODAY

- THE ASSOCIATED PRESS — WASHINGTON

A high-stakes partisan row quickly broke out Thursday over a confidenti­al FBI report about allegation­s that Brett Kavanaugh sexually abused women three decades ago, with Republican­s claiming investigat­ors found “no hint of misconduct“and Democrats accusing the White House of slapping crippling constraint­s on the probe.

The verbal battling commenced as the conservati­ve jurist’s prospects for winning Senate confirmati­on to the Supreme Court remained at the mercy of five wavering senators, with an initial, critical vote looming today. It followed the FBI’s early-morning release of its investigat­ion, which President Donald Trump reluctantl­y ordered under pressure from a handful of wavering GOP senators.

“There’s nothing in it that we didn’t already know,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said in a written statement. He said he based his view on a briefing from committee aides and added, “This investigat­ion found no hint of misconduct.”

Top Democrats fired back after getting their own briefing.

The Judiciary panel’s top Democrat, Dianne Feinstein of California, said it appeared that the White House had “blocked the FBI from doing its job.” She said that while Democrats had agreed to limit the probe’s scope, “we did not agree that the White House should tie the FBI’s hands.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has already started a process that will produce a crucial test vote in his polarized chamber today on Kavanaugh’s fate. Should Republican­s get the majority of votes they need — and Vice-President Mike Pence is available to cast the tiebreaker, if necessary — that would set up a decisive roll call on his confirmati­on, likely over the weekend.

Feinstein complained Thursday that agents had not interviewe­d Kavanaugh or Christine Blasey Ford, who has testified that he sexually attacked her in a locked bedroom during a high school gathering in 1982. Feinstein also said attorneys for Deborah Ramirez, who’s claimed Kavanaugh exposed himself to her when both were Yale freshmen, had no indication the FBI had reached out to people she’d offered for corroborat­ion.

Grassley said the FBI could not “locate any third parties who can attest to any of the allegation­s,” and he said there is “no contempora­neous evidence.” He provided no specifics.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Democrats’ fears that the “very limited process” laid out for the investigat­ion would restrain the FBI “have been realized.”

He also said, “I disagree with Sen. Grassley’s statement that there was no hint of misconduct.” Neither side provided any detail about what the report said, constraine­d by years-old arrangemen­ts that require the results of FBI background checks to remain confidenti­al.

Earlier, White House spokesman Raj Shah rebuffed Democrats’ complaints, saying, “What critics want is a never-ending fishing expedition into high school drinking.” He said the FBI reached out to 10 people and interviewe­d nine, including “several individual­s at the request of the Senate, and had a series of follow-up interviews ... following certain leads.”

While the FBI interviews were to focus on sexual assault allegation­s, Democrats have also questioned Kavanaugh’s drinking habits during high school and college and dishonest comments they say he has made about his background. Kavanaugh has said stories of his bad behaviour while drinking are exaggerate­d.

Three women have accused him of sexual misconduct in separate incidents in the 1980s. Kavanaugh, 53, now a judge on the powerful District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, has denied the claims.

The White House received the FBI report around 3 a.m. Thursday.

Trump weighed in hours later in a tweet in which he denounced what he called “the harsh and unfair treatment” of Kavanaugh.

“This great life cannot be ruined by mean” and “despicable Democrats and totally uncorrobor­ated allegation­s!”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada