Lethbridge Herald

Kavanaugh sworn in as new U.S. Supreme Court judge

CONFIRMATI­ON A VICTORY FOR TRUMP

- THE ASSOCIATED PRESS — WASHINGTON

Brett Kavanaugh was sworn in as a Supreme Court justice Saturday night after the bitterly polarized U.S. Senate narrowly confirmed him. The Senate vote delivered an election-season triumph to President Donald Trump that could swing the court rightward for a generation after a battle that rubbed raw the country’s cultural, gender and political divides.

Kavanaugh was quickly sworn in at the court building, across the street from the Capitol, even as protesters chanted outside.

The near party-line Senate vote was 50-48, capping a fight that seized the national conversati­on after claims emerged that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted women three decades ago — which he emphatical­ly denied. Those allegation­s magnified the clash from a routine Supreme Court struggle over judicial ideology into an angrier, more complex jumble of questions about victims’ rights, the presumptio­n of innocence and personal attacks on nominees.

Acrimoniou­s to the end, the battle featured a climactic roll call that was interrupte­d several times by protesters in the Senate galleries before Capitol Police removed them. Vice-President Mike Pence presided over the roll call, his potential tie-breaking vote unnecessar­y.

Trump, flying to Kansas for a political rally, flashed a thumbs-up gesture when the tally was announced and praised Kavanaugh for being “able to withstand this horrible, horrible attack by the Democrats.”

The vote gave Trump his second appointee to the court, pleasing conservati­ve voters who might have revolted against GOP leaders had Kavanaugh’s nomination flopped. Instead, “It’s turned our base on fire,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told reporters.

Democrats hope that the roll call, exactly a month from elections in which House and Senate control are in play, will do the opposite, prompting infuriated women and liberals to oust Republican­s.

“Change must come from where change in America always begins: the ballot box,” said Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York, looking ahead to November.

Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia,

confrontin­g a tough re-election race next month in a state that Trump won in 2016 by a landslide, was the sole Democrat to vote for Kavanaugh. Every voting Republican backed the 53-year-old conservati­ve judge.

Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski, the only Republican to oppose the nominee, voted “present,” offsetting the absence of Kavanaugh supporter Steve Daines of Montana, who was attending his daughter’s wedding. That rare procedural manoeuvr left Kavanaugh with the same two-vote margin he’d have had if Murkowski and Daines had both voted.

Republican­s hold only a 51-49 Senate majority and therefore had little support to spare.

It was the closest roll call to confirm a justice since 1881, when Stanley Matthews was approved by 24-23, according to Senate records.

Within minutes, dozens of political and advocacy groups blasted out emailed reactions.

Stephanie Schriock, president of EMILY’s List, which contribute­s to female Democratic candidates, assailed the confirmati­on of “an

alleged sexual assailant and antichoice radical to a lifetime appointmen­t on the Supreme Court. But we will carry that anger into the election. Women will not forget this.”

Kay Coles James, president of the conservati­ve Heritage Foundation, called the vote “a victory for liberty in America” and called Kavanaugh “a good man and good jurist.”

The outcome, telegraphe­d Friday when the final undeclared senators revealed their views, was devoid of the shocks that had come almost daily since Christine Blasey Ford said last month that an inebriated Kavanaugh tried to rape her at a 1982 high school get-together.

Since then, the country watched agape as one electric moment after another gushed forth. These included the emergence of two other accusers; an unforgetta­ble Senate Judiciary Committee hearing at which a composed Ford and a seething Kavanaugh told their diametrica­lly opposed stories, and a truncated FBI investigat­ion that the agency said showed no corroborat­ing evidence and Democrats lambasted as a White House-shackled farce.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada