Lethbridge Herald

Alberta farmers on the fence about carbon credits

- Alejandra Pulido-Guzman apulido@lethbridge­herald.com Follow @APulidoHer­ald on Twitter

The School of Public Policy of the University of Calgary has released a report on why Alberta farmers are reluctant to use carbon credits that can potentiall­y help lower emissions.

Report authors Nimanthika Lokuge and Sven Anders provide a comprehens­ive review highlighti­ng the gaps in existing knowledge related to agricultur­al carbon credits and offsets with particular interest in Alberta.

According to the authors, “Participat­ing in a carbon-credit system allows farmers to generate credits for reducing emissions; they can then sell those credits for cash on a credit market to emitters who need to purchase carbonoffs­et allowances for exceeding their mandated emission limits.”

There has been little exploratio­n to date of the effectiven­ess of using carbon credits to encourage Alberta farmers to practice farming techniques that lower emissions, while earning extra revenue without jeopardizi­ng their agricultur­al output.

The authors state in the report that despite there being an active carbon-offset market in Alberta, however, farmers in the province hardly participat­e. This appears to be partly due to a history of regulatory risk: the agricultur­e sector has seen the revocation of carbon-credit eligibilit­y for certain practices, and invalidate­d credits can lead to significan­t financial losses for farmers.

They add that farmers are also reluctant to participat­e due to the inadequacy of offset credit revenues in covering the foregone costs of implementi­ng emission-reduction practices given current carbon-offset prices and the emissions level per farm.

As the province with the most beef cattle, the second-largest number of farms and farmed area in the country, and as one of Canada’s biggest producers of crops, Alberta is a huge part of the national agricultur­e sector. It has also been responsibl­e for the highest level of agricultur­al greenhouse-gas emissions in the country.

According to the report, some loweremiss­ion farming protocols have proved profitable for farmers by improving efficiency, even without carbon-offset incentives. While farmers may adopt these practices for their own reasons, they are reluctant to participat­e in Alberta’s carbon-offset market unless they are sufficient­ly rewarded.

The report also states that Alberta policymake­rs should emphasize the intrinsic efficiency benefits to farmers of implementi­ng these protocols for their own sake. Convincing farmers in the province to invest in emissionre­ducing technologi­es for the purpose of making money in the current Alberta carbon market will, for the time being, remain a difficult sell.

It adds the fact that market conditions thus far have not encouraged them to do so. Alberta farmers may continue to largely sit out the carbon-credit market until returns for earning credits become more stable and more rewarding.

The report can be found online at www.policyscho­ol.ca/publicatio­ns/

 ?? HERALD FILE PHOTO ?? A combine travels along a gravel road among the fields east of Lethbridge during a past growing season in southern Alberta. A new report sheds light on why Alberta farmers are reluctant to use carbon credits that can potentiall­y help lower emissions.
HERALD FILE PHOTO A combine travels along a gravel road among the fields east of Lethbridge during a past growing season in southern Alberta. A new report sheds light on why Alberta farmers are reluctant to use carbon credits that can potentiall­y help lower emissions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada