Lethbridge Herald

Ottawa considers changes to clean electricit­y rules after consultati­ons

-

Ottawa is considerin­g alteration­s to its proposed clean-electricit­y regulation­s after consultati­ons with industry, opening the door to more flexibilit­y for individual power generators.

“We can still get to the same aim,” said Oliver Anderson, a spokesman with Environmen­t and Climate Change Canada.

The proposed changes, released Friday, would change several provisions that industry and provincial government­s objected to in the original version.

The changes suggest dropping intensity-based standards from greenhouse-gas emissions limits. That means generators would no longer be forced to meet a single standard of how much carbon is emitted per unit of energy.

Instead, each generator would be assigned an annual emissions limit.

As well, companies that own a number of generators would be allowed to pool emissions from facilities operating in the same jurisdicti­on. Companies would also be allowed to buy carbon offsets to compensate for overshooti­ng their assigned limits.

The government is also considerin­g changes to how new plants are brought in under the regulation­s.

Under the previous scheme, operators were concerned about the requiremen­t that all generation would have to either be renewable or be equipped with carbon abatement by 2035. They argued that projects already under constructi­on would be disadvanta­ged and could be left stranded once the new rules took effect.

The government now proposes a time-limited exemption to that rule for fossil-fuel generators that come into operation before 2025.

“Any fossil fuel-burning electric generation built before 2025 can operate for 20 years without having the regulation­s apply to it,” Anderson said. “There could be a bit of wiggle room on the start date.”

Industries that generate their own power and feed extra back into the grid are also affected by the proposals.

Previously, all generated power would have been affected by the regulation­s. Under the suggested changes, only power that gets fed back into the grid is affected.

Finally, small generators producing under 25 megawatts would still be exempted. But any new units at the same facility collective­ly generating more than that would have to follow the regulation­s.

Anderson said the government hasn’t calculated how the changes would affect greenhouse-gas emission reductions.

“That’s part of what we’re going to be consulting on, to see what the impact would be,” he said. “The department has a strong sense this puts us in the same ballpark.”

The government is asking industry to respond to the suggested changes by March 15.

They come after sharp criticism of the initial proposals.

Both Alberta and Saskatchew­an said it isn’t possible for their grids to achieve net-zero by 2035 without hurting reliabilit­y or costing their residents a fortune.

Alberta Environmen­t and Protected Areas Minister Rebecca Schulz said the proposed changes don’t alter her opposition.

“Instead of learning from yet another failure, (Environmen­t and Climate Change) Minister (Steven) Guilbeault has offered an 11-page report that commits to zero meaningful correction­s,” Schulz said in an emailed statement.

“The proposed regulation­s still put our province’s electricit­y grid at unacceptab­le risks.”

Schulz said provinces have exclusive jurisdicti­on over electricit­y, although in a ruling on the federal carbon price the Supreme Court said Ottawa can regulate greenhouse gases.

Uof C energy economist Blake Shaffer was more compliment­ary.

“The design changes being considered are a step in the right direction towards providing more flexibilit­y while still keeping the goal of reducing emissions from electricit­y generation,” he said in an email.

He said moving to an emissions cap instead of an intensity-based target is a good move that he’d like to see extended.

“Rather than a certain number of tonnes per calendar year, make it some amount over a longer period, say three years, so that fleets can better manage across different periods with different conditions (such as) droughts.”

Climate advocates welcomed the new proposals.

“The revised design ... is a welcome change that will deliver more flexibilit­y for grid operators in order to protect reliabilit­y and support affordabil­ity,” said Jason Dion, research director for the Canadian Climate Institute, who called for finalizing the regulation­s as early as possible.

Evan Pivnick of Clean Energy Canada also called for the regulation­s to be completed quickly, but warned changes shouldn’t compromise emissions reduction.

“Flexibilit­y should be balanced with the necessary stringency, and more details on the new proposal are needed to determine if the former compromise­s the latter.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada