Maclean's

Examinatio­n for discovery

-

Kim Campbell-McLean’s BY LINDSAY JONES · people have been in Labrador for more than 4,000 years. So when the annual provincial holiday that celebrates John Cabot’s “discovery” of North America in 1497 rolls around every summer, she feels sad and infuriated.

“It gives the false impression that there was nobody here before Cabot came,” says Campbell-McLean, executive director of the AnanauKati­get Tumingit Regional Inuit Women’s Associatio­n from North West River. “It’s quite insulting actually, and none of our Aboriginal organizati­ons acknowledg­e Discovery Day. We certainly don’t celebrate it.”

Last year, St. John’s city councillor Maggie Burton started a successful movement to change the name of the holiday within the provincial capital, which falls on the first Monday on or a er June 24. Council voted 5-4 in favour of scrapping the name and for now, the city refers to Discovery Day as “St. John’s Day” (in honour of the spot Cabot may or may not have sailed into when he first came to North America).

Burton is now calling on the provincial government to select a more “appropriat­e” name for the holiday, arguing the concept of “discovery” is “the kind of historic symbol that has no place in a modern, shared national identity.” She was referring in part to findings of the landmark Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls report, which identified European arrival and exploratio­n as one of the first steps that led to structures of colonial violence. “I believe renaming Discovery Day is one way we can stop wrongly emphasizin­g settler perspectiv­es over Indigenous perspectiv­es,” Burton said.

St. John’s city councillor Sandy Hickman disagrees; he voted against Burton’s motion on the grounds that it’s not a city issue. But he also argues the name should stand simply because it’s an important date in history. “The Queen’s birthday may not have meaning to everyone, but the date is an official holiday that will not be called by another name because it is significan­t for that reason only,” Hickman said. “Discovery Day is exactly the same. To change the name does a disservice to our history.”

On one level, the challenge of Discovery Day is the latest instance of landmarks, monuments and celebratio­ns conceived from a Eurocentri­c perspectiv­e coming under scrutiny as the country takes steps toward reconcilia­tion. In Halifax, the statue of Edward Cornwallis has come down. The “Indian Village” at the

Calgary Stampede has been renamed the Elbow River Camp. Land acknowledg­ements are becoming routine at public gatherings.

Yet few of these objects and events seem as elemental as Discovery Day, whose very name conjures a land seen through the eyes of European adventurer­s—“empty” and “uncivilize­d” and above all, “new.” These ideas became the underpinni­ng of the country’s founding myth—at least as understood by non-Indigenous Canadians.

Cabot was the Italian explorer who, under the commission of the British government in 1497, became the first European a er the Vikings to reach coastal North America. Newfoundla­nd and Labrador declared a holiday in 1997 to commemorat­e 500 years since Cabot’s arrival on its rugged shores, likely in Bonavista or St. John’s. The celebratio­ns culminated with a $3.8-million replica of Cabot’s ship, the Matthew, tracing its maiden journey to North America from Bristol, England, to Bonavista, where, amid much pomp and fanfare, it was received by Queen Elizabeth II.

Back in the late 1990s, reconcilia­tion was not top of mind. But it was widely known that the event overlooked a sorry history: that the island of Newfoundla­nd had been populated by the Beothuk, who were brought to extinction by disease, starvation and violence at the hands of newcomers; that Labrador had been inhabited by Innu, Inuit and Metis people who were just then entering a phase of renewed cultural awareness and self-governance.

Today, the holiday is celebrated with many government employees having a paid day off, though shops are open. There’s a regatta in Quidi Vidi, and a lively debate ensues each year on social media. The NunatuKavu­t Community Council, representi­ng about 6,000 Inuit in southern and central Labrador, is calling on the government to halt observance of Discovery Day. And on Twitter, St. John’s West NDP District Associatio­n posted a poll asking, “Do you support replacing Discovery Day in favour of a day oriented towards reconcilia­tion with NL’s and Canada’s Indigenous peoples?” Of 119 votes, 63 per cent voted yes, while 31 per cent voted no. Six per cent voted other.

It’s a debate that Seamus O’Regan, the federal Minister of Indigenous Services, who grew up in Labrador’s Happy Valley-Goose Bay and represents the riding of St. John’s South-Mount Pearl, says he welcomes.

But it may be short-lived. While newly reelected premier Dwight Ball hasn’t committed to a name change, he issued a statement last year saying the province is open to discussing the question—a position his office says he still holds. All it would take is a request from at least one Indigenous organizati­on, but so far, he said, none has reached out.

And that, it would seem, was all the encouragem­ent Kim Campbell-McLean needed. When informed of the premier’s position, she told Maclean’s she had taken Ball at his word, writing him a letter asking that the name of Discovery Day be changed once and for all.

 ??  ?? Cabot’s statue in Bonavista; St. John’s is debating civic emphasis on Eurocentri­c views
Cabot’s statue in Bonavista; St. John’s is debating civic emphasis on Eurocentri­c views

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada