Unclear whether report into Alberta oil and gas critics will meet deadline
A spokesman for Alberta’s inquiry into the funding of oil and gas industry critics is not confirming whether its twice-delayed report will be handed in by its Sunday deadline.
“When there’s something to share, we will share it,” said Alan Boras, who added commissioner Steve Allan’s work was ongoing.
Premier Jason Kenney and his UCP government contend that foreign interests have long been bankrolling campaigns against Canadian fossil fuel development.
Allan, a forensic accountant, was tapped in 2019 to lead a public inquiry with an initial budget of $2.5 million and a July 2020 deadline.
Last summer, Allan was given a four-month extension and a $1-million budget increase. In October, the inquiry got another 90-day extension, but no new money.
Energy Minister Sonya Savage must publish the final report within 90 days of receiving it.
The Opposition NDP called on the government Friday to immediately release the results of the “overdue, overbudget, scandal-tainted, notso-public inquiry” once it’s received.
“Albertans have waited long enough to hear back from this kangaroo court,” energy critic Kathleen Ganley said in a statement.
She noted thousands of energy sector workers are without a job, projects have been cancelled, investment has fled and new U.S. President Joe Biden has cancelled the Alberta-toTexas Keystone XL oil pipeline expansion.
“If Steve
Allan has something useful to say, Albertans deserve to hear it immediately.”
Environmental law group Ecojustice filed a lawsuit in November 2019 that alleged the inquiry was politically motivated, biased and outside provincial jurisdiction. Late last year, Ecojustice lost a court bid to have Allan’s work paused until there was a ruling in the lawsuit.
Eleven groups and individuals were granted standing to be a “participant for commentary” before the inquiry, but Boras said their identities are not being disclosed.
Participants were provided reading material, including links to reports commissioned by the inquiry that contained passages denying or downplaying the broad scientific consensus around humancaused climate change. Those materials no longer appear to be on the website.
One commissioned report, by University of Calgary political scientist Barry Cooper, argued that philanthropic foundations have been captured by ideological environmental activists. It mentioned “growing scientific skepticism regarding the so-called consensus view regarding anthropogenic climate change” and “apocalyptic” and “alarmist” “rhetoric” around the issue.
Another report the inquiry requested from T.L. Nemeth contended there was a “transnational global movement” afoot to replace the current capitalist world order with “a new global low-carbon, netzero civilization.” In it, the author suggested climate change is not due to human activity, but natural phenomena, and that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, but “a gas essential to all life on Earth.”
The inquiry said on its website that the reports were meant to “obtain perspectives” from participants and didn’t represent any findings or positions it has taken. Allan does not consider the science of climate change to be part of the inquiry’s mandate, the website originally said.
Those comments were part of the same section that appears to have been taken down.