Draft of Saskatchewan’s pronoun policy gave teachers discretion for at-risk students
Emails show an early draft of Saskatchewan’s school pronoun policy would have allowed teachers to use a child’s preferred identification if there was concern the student faced danger when parents were notified.
Premier Scott Moe’s government announced the policy last year. It requires teachers to have parental consent when children under 16 want to change their names or pronouns. The move received widespread criticism, with many human rights groups and the province’s advocate for children saying it violates rights to gender identity and expression.
More than 2,200 pages of documents and emails recently obtained by The Canadian Press under freedom of information laws provide insight into what provincial employees were considering as they came up with the policy.
The heavily redacted emails show that starting around Aug. 10, employees were researching a similar policy brought in months earlier in New Brunswick.
The subject line in many of the emails was “rush jurisdictional scan,” and they show employees also looked to educational policies in Canada and the United States.
Saskatchewan’s early policy draft gave room for administrators to use discretion if they believed children could be put at risk if their parents were notified.
It said when gaining parental consent is not in the best interest of a child or could result in physical, mental or emotional harm, “the director of education or designate may choose to accept the consent of student under the age of 16, if they believe that the student is sufficiently mature to understand and explain their rationale for the decision, as well as the impact and implications of their decision.”
That option was removed less than two weeks later, when the education minister at the time,Dustin Duncan, announced the official policy. That version said an appropriate school professional would work with an at-risk student to develop a plan to speak with the parents.
Emails show information was provided to teachers and schools at the time of the official policy announcement. In situations with an unsafe student, “school personnel will have to continue using the child’s birth name and pronoun in class” until they get permission from parents.
The government did not say why the draft policy was changed.
In an emailed statement, the province said the policy, which was later passed into legislation, was the result of the “government listening to parents about wanting to be more included in their children’s education.”
Emails previously obtained under freedom of information laws show the government received 18 official complaints last June and July before it implemented the policy in August. Court has heard it was developed in nine days.
“It’s clear that the government policy and decision making on this issue wasn’t thoughtful or based on any evidence,” said Cee Strauss, a senior staff lawyer with the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund.
The group has intervener status in a current legal challenge of the legislation.