Medicine Hat News

Conservati­ves want Commons Speaker to resign, claim he let Trudeau cross the line

- STEPHANIE TAYLOR -- with files from Anja Karadeglij­a and Mickey Djuric

Conservati­ve MPs want House of Commons Speaker Greg Fergus to resign after ejecting their leader — and not Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — during a heated debate Tuesday.

The Conservati­ves say Fergus did not apply the rules equally during a tense back and forth between Trudeau and Conservati­ve Leader Pierre Poilievre.

Poilievre was kicked out of the chamber after he called Trudeau a “wacko prime minister” and refused Fergus’s request to withdraw the remark. His entire caucus eventually left as well in protest.

The insult was hurled as Poilievre pressed Trudeau to agree to British Columbia’s request to amend a Health Canada provision decriminal­izing public possession of hard drugs like heroin and fentanyl.

Trudeau instead shot back that Poilievre did not deserve elected office, accusing him of courting farright extremists.

Last week videos emerged of Poilievre visiting a carbon price protest camp in Atlantic Canada where one of the trailers featured a drawing of a symbol belonging to the far-right online group Diagolon.

Conservati­ve MP John Brassard said Wednesday that Trudeau used “undignifie­d” language Tuesday by inferring that Tories are connected to white nationalis­ts.

“The Conservati­ve party has never been represente­d by a more diverse group in this country like we’ve seen now, and to imply and infer that somehow we are white nationalis­ts or racists, I think is undignifie­d,” he told reporters on Wednesday.

Michael Barrett, the party’s ethics critic in Parliament, said equal rules must be applied in the House when the prime minister is delivering what Barrett calls “personal insults” instead of defending his drug policy.

A spokesman for Fergus said Wednesday that the Speaker didn’t just single out Poilievre, noting he also asked Trudeau to reframe one of his questions after he called Poilievre a “spineless leader.”

“The prime minister reframed his answer,’ Mathieu Gravel said.

“The Speaker offered Mr. Poilievre four opportunit­ies to withdraw his comment and reframe his question.

Mr. Poilievre did not avail himself of those opportunit­ies.”

Poilievre instead told Fergus he would replace the word “wacko” with “extremist” and “radical,” which the Speaker rejected, asking him to withdraw use of the term altogether.

When he did not, Fergus ordered him to leave.

The Conservati­ve leader cried censorship and said Fergus was trying to protect the prime minister.

Gravel said Fergus “has no intention of resigning.”

Most of Wednesday’s question period was far less raucous, with the Conservati­ves set in a sedate tone. The backand-forth between opposition and government MPs, which saw both Trudeau and Poilievre participat­e, unfolded without need for the Speaker to step in.

Poilievre avoided bringing up the previous day’s events.

Rather he spoke in a slow, measured manner throughout, and didn’t react when Trudeau referenced the “new, more reasonable tone of the leader of the Opposition” and again accused Poilievre of refusing to “condemn violent extremism.”

But close to an hour into question period, when Trudeau did it again, some Conservati­ve MPs began shouting “black face” at him. That is a reference to images of Trudeau that emerged in 2021 showing him wearing black, or brown face on more than one occasion prior to getting into politics.

House of Commons rules state if the Speaker determines “offensive or disorderly language” was used, the MP will be asked to withdraw the unparliame­ntary remarks, and “must rise in his or her place to retract the words unequivoca­lly.”

The rules don’t define unparliame­ntary language, instead allowing the Speaker to make the decision based on a number of factors, including tone, intention and most importantl­y whether the remarks caused any disorder in the chamber. That means the same language can be deemed unparliame­ntary one day but not the next.

Liberals came to Fergus’s defence on Tuesday and continued to slam Poilievre’s actions and that of his caucus.

“When we saw the Conservati­ves storm out in protest, I thought it was immature,” said Housing Minister Sean Fraser.

“Nobody sent me to Ottawa to storm out of the House of Commons. Some of the comments that I heard coming from Opposition MPs was cheerleadi­ng that it was happening, saying ‘are you trying to help us with our fundraisin­g. We’re going to raise an extra million dollars off this.”’

The Conservati­ve party sent out a fundraisin­g blast within an hour of the incident.

Similarly, the Liberal party’s social media lit up with footage of cabinet ministers and Trudeau himself calling out Poilievre, accusing him of courting far-right extremists.

Government House leader Steven MacKinnon said on Wednesday that the Speaker was elected by MPs and respects all of his rulings.

On Tuesday, he also compared Poilievre’s behaviour to that of former U.S. President Donald Trump, which is a frequent attack the Liberals mount against the Canadian Conservati­ve, accusing the party of importing American-style politics into the country.

“They come into our democratic institutio­ns, they break all the rules and when they are called on breaking all the rules they leave and say they’ve been gagged,” MacKinnon said.

 ?? ?? Pierre Poilievre
Pierre Poilievre
 ?? ?? Justin Trudeau
Justin Trudeau

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada