Montreal Gazette

Oxycontin withdrawal foreseen

Drug maker’s replacemen­t of ‘Hillbilly heroin’ could lead to a run on ER services, critics say

- SHARON KIRKEY

The pending removal from the market of one of the most abused prescripti­on drugs in Canada could make the tragedy of under-treated pain worse and lead to other unintended consequenc­es for which we aren’t prepared.

Starting Thursday, the manufactur­er of Oxycontin – the prescripti­on pain reliever known as “Hillbilly heroin” for its ability to produce a heroin-like hit when snorted or injected – is phasing out the drug and replacing it with OXYNEO, a reformulat­ed version that its maker says is harder to crush or liquefy.

Six provinces – but not Quebec – have almost simultaneo­usly announced plans to restrict access to OXYNEO.

Leaders in the pain-management medical community are calling that move a misguided and emotional response that could lead to unforeseen fallout – such as a run on emergency services for people going into withdrawal, or wider prescribin­g of less-controlled, but potentiall­y more harmful, opioids.

Some of those opioids are as much as six times more powerful than morphine.

The controvers­y is exposing deep divisions in the medical community. Some doctors say the limits being imposed on a drug dispensed 1.6 million times in 2010 alone can’t come soon enough.

Dr. David Juurlink said opioids in general, and long-acting oxycodone (the active ingredient in Oxycontin) in particular, are being prescribed at dangerousl­y high doses and often for long periods of time, without good evidence from randomized, controlled trials that the benefits of such a practice outweigh the risks.

Restrictin­g access isn’t likely to make a meaningful dent in the problem of opioid abuse, said Juurlink, head of clinical pharmacolo­gy at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto.

Addicts, the Toronto doctor said, will simply switch to something else. What it will do, he predicted, is lead to fewer prescripti­ons for long-acting oxycodone.

What doctors have been taught about the prescribin­g of opioids such as oxycodone has come largely from pharmaceut­ical companies and doctors paid to speak on their behalf, Juurlink said, “and what we’ve been taught is wrong.”

Although some chronic-pain patients clearly do benefit, “there are also a number of patients who do not,” he said.

By some estimates, more than 100,000 North Americans have died in the past 25 years as a result of prescripti­on opioids, he said.

Opioids slow the transmissi­on of pain signals to the brain.

They also alter the sensation of pain. They produce, on average, about a 30-per-cent reduction in chronic-pain intensity.

Their side effects include nausea, dizziness, sedation, constipati­on and fatigue, and new research has started linking their long-term use with osteoporos­is and immune-suppressin­g effects.

Today, Canadians are among the highest users of prescripti­on opioids in the world.

In the past decade alone, our opioid consumptio­n has more than doubled, and the biggest increases have been for the heavy-hitters, including oxycodone (which is 1½ to two times more potent than morphine) and hydromorph­one (five to six times more potent than morphine), according to a recent study by British Columbia and Ontario researcher­s.

Among the provinces, Alberta had the overall highest opioid use rate in the country in 2010, Quebec the lowest – but nowhere are the rates falling.

Prescripti­ons for oxycodone are increasing in all provinces.

According to Ontario’s Health Ministry, between 300 and 400 people die each year in the province from opioid-related overdoses and the opioid most frequently found during autopsies in recent years is oxycodone.

Jokes about doctors’ dreadful handwritin­g are as common as old magazines in waiting rooms. But there’s nothing funny about some of the problems that result when patients, pharmacist­s and nurses can’t understand a doctor’s prescripti­ons.

The first national study of patient safety in Canadian hospitals found that one in 13 in-patients suffers harm because of a medical error. In some cases, this means a longer hospital stay or additional pain and discomfort. In others, it results in preventabl­e deaths. Drug-related errors are responsibl­e for a quarter of the incidents of patient injury.

In fact, only surgery causes more preventabl­e harm in hospitals. Out-patient prescripti­on errors are harder to measure, but community pharmacist­s estimate that between 10% and 15% of prescripti­ons they fill contain some kind of error.

Illegible handwritin­g is one of the major culprits, but so are other bad prescribin­g habits, such as abbreviati­ons for timing and dosage, and the use of similarsou­nding trade names for drugs rather than their full chemical identifier­s. When computers are integrated into the prescribin­g process, these potentiall­y dangerous mistakes can be prevented. Prescripti­on software makes it impossible for doctors to use abbreviati­ons for dose informatio­n, and prompts doctors to double check that they’ve ordered the right drug.

Richard Alvarez is the president and CEO of Canada Health Infoway, a non-profit organizati­on created by provincial premiers in 2001 to promote the best possible integratio­n of IT into health care across the country. “Our priority is to get drug informatio­n systems available across Canada that would do several things,” he explains. “Primarily, they’ll allow a physician, a nurse or a pharmacist to view a patient’s entire medication history, to see if what is being prescribed or dispensed is the right drug for that patient’s situation, and to correct it if not.”

Robert Mcqueen owns and operates a pharmacy in Edmonton, and has been at the forefront of integratin­g IT into his practice. Almost a decade ago, his store was one of the first to compile prescripti­ons in a central database, which flagged any errors and returned the results the next day. Since September 2011, though, these transactio­ns can happen in real time, which helps Mr. McQueen provide better service to his customers, and prevent inappropri­ate dispensing of drugs, be it from error or deliberate prescripti­on abuse.

“If someone comes in with a prescripti­on that includes a narcotic, you can now see immediatel­y if they’ve just filled a prescripti­on for another narcotic somewhere else,” he says. “It gives us more complete informatio­n.”

Allergies and medical conditions are also associated with each record, which helps ensure a patient with a chronic disease isn’t given a potentiall­y harmful drug that’s prescribed by a doctor who doesn’t know the full medical history.

Prescripti­on databases also flag potential interactio­ns between different drugs, a function that becomes increasing­ly important as the population ages. The aver- age senior fills almost tions each year, a n has doubled since 19 electronic records, d pharmacist­s have to patient’s memory to they don’t prescribe drugs that are safe on but potentiall­y dang combined with anoth

Today, fewer than adian doctors give computer printout to drugstore, or fax th

t 40 prescripnu­mber that 90. Without doctors and o rely on the o make sure or dispense n their own, gerous when er. half of Canpatient­s a o take to the he printout themselves. While those legible documents eliminate miscommuni­cation between doctors and pharmacist­s, they still allow errors to creep in when the informatio­n is entered manually at the pharmacy. The ultimate goal is for doctors to create an electronic prescripti­on, that will automatica­lly be sent to the right pharmacy and entered into the patient’s personal health record. When the prescripti­on is filled, this informatio­n too is logged in the patient’s history, so doctors can verify that patients are getting the medication as prescribed, and refilling it at the right time.

“Some of the doctors i n my building are allergists, and they tell me they spend a lot of their time trying to figure out if the patient was compliant,” says Mr. Mcqueen, meaning that the patient took the medication as directed, or whether the medication didn’t work. “They can now look at the database and see when the prescripti­ons were filled, so they know whether they’re chasing down a problem with compliance, which is totally different than a problem with the drugs that are prescribed.”

In 2010, an Infoway study showed that to date, provincial drug informatio­n systems have yielded savings of $436-million. When these systems become completely available online across the country, they will save between $2-billion and $3-billion per year. Much of the savings will result from better provider productivi­ty.

When electronic records and prescripti­ons are the norm, pharmacist­s won’t need to call doctors back to verify prescripti­ons, or delay dispensing until they’ve been able to reach a doctor. In addition, electronic­ally submitted prescripti­ons won’t need to be entered manually at the pharmacy. Based on studies in regions with electronic prescribin­g, Infoway also estimates that switching to electronic prescribin­g will cut prescripti­on abuse by 60%.

When medical error harms patients, costs to the system rise still further, and patients themselves become less productive, with a lower quality of life. But for those who who suffer permanent injury, or who die as a result of a drug error, the costs are incalculab­le.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada