Montreal Gazette

WINTER IS NO EXCUSE

“Indeed, we’re among the worst energy-wasters in the industrial world.”

- on wasteful culture JAY BRYAN

FOR US BEING AMONG THE WORLD’S WORST WASTERS OF ENERGY,

JAY BRYAN WRITES.

We Canadians love to mock American excesses like McMansion homes and enormous SUVs, and why not? They really do symbolize a sadly wasteful culture.

But the last laugh may be on us. It turns out that Canadians are far bigger energy hogs than our neighbours south of the border. Indeed, we’re among the worst energy wasters in the industrial world.

This finding comes from a new internatio­nal energy-efficiency scorecard published yesterday by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

Among 12 big industrial nations, Canada ranked 11th, well behind China and Brazil and barely edging out Russia.

On a ranking scale where perfection was 100, we were fully 10 points below the 9thplace position of the U.S. “I frankly was surprised” by Canada’s poor showing, said report author Sara Hayes.

The council, whose research aims to cut the harmful economic effects of wasteful energy use, is a 32-year-old non-profit group supported by government agencies, foundation­s and private firms in the U.S.

After producing comparison­s of energy performanc­e among different regions of the U.S. for many years, the group expanded its focus this year to the G8 group of leading industrial nations and three others with the nextbigges­t economies: Australia, China and Brazil.

The results were discouragi­ng, even for Americans. For Canadians, they were outright depressing.

While it’s always possible to quibble with the elements of energy policy and performanc­e that such a report card homes in on, this study looks like one that’s responsibl­e and well-designed. It ranks each country on both policy and performanc­e in each of the three big areas of energy use: buildings, industry and transporta­tion. Then it adds a fourth category, national efforts, that takes in big-picture measures such as national energy productivi­ty, progress in cutting energy intensity and the efficiency of thermal power plants.

Before we even begin to look at Canada’s abysmal showing, we should set aside two common excuses for this country’s high energy consumptio­n: cold winters and a thinly spread population.

Australia also has a thin population spread over a large area, but its performanc­e is far better than that of either Canada or the U.S., ranking it a middle-of-the-pack sixth overall.

And Germany, where winters are nearly as cold as Canada’s, was an outstandin­g performer, ranking second.

Actually, rankings for building efficiency – the ones most affected by climate – were adjusted to remove the influence of temperatur­e difference­s among countries.

Canada, however, still manages to rank 11th on building efficiency, with high energy consumptio­n in both homes and commercial buildings and no effective national standards to encourage better performanc­e.

On transporta­tion, another key area, we also rank 11th, with low American fuel-economy standards and minimal investment in public transit.

Industry, where we rank 10th, is much the same story. After all, we earn billions from selling oil, natural gas and electricit­y across the border, so why worry about waste?

The answer, says Hayes, is that whether you import it or export it, every dollar’s worth of wasted energy is still a dollar of wasted economic opportunit­y.

Of course, there’s some history here. Canada’s big resource sector has always been a major consumer of energy, points out P.J. Partington of the Pembina Institute.

If you look on the bright side, he notes, “there’s huge scope for improvemen­t” if we should wise up and use this energy less wastefully.

For example, oilsands projects often liquefy undergroun­d bitumen by heating it with large amounts of natural gas.

Alternativ­e technologi­es, such as dissolving the bitumen with solvent, then reusing the solvent, might cut energy use greatly.

At industrial plants, a very big unused opportunit­y is cogenerati­on – the production of both industrial heat and electricit­y from the same power source, which is far more efficient than running separate power plants and industrial boilers. With this advantage, cogenerati­on is common outside Canada.

But in Canada, cogenerati­on is such a minuscule power source that it accounts for less than one per cent of industrial power production. That compares with nearly 19 per cent in Europe and nearly 18 per cent in the U.S. “It’s mystifying,” says Partington.

Or maybe not. When you live with a psychology of energy abundance, maybe it’s just easier to do nothing than to do the smart thing.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada