Montreal Gazette

City takes over Bonaventur­e project

Société du havre stripped of its duty

- CHRISTOPHE­R CURTIS THE GAZETTE ccurtis@montrealga­zette.com Twitter: @titocurtis

The city of Montreal is taking control of the $200-million reconstruc­tion of the Bonaventur­e Expressway after having outsourced $18-million in planning studies for the project to the Société du hav re— a publicly funded, private, non-profit agency that was scrutinize­d by the city’s auditor-general this spring. Christophe­r Curtis reports.

After outsourcin­g $19 million in studies for the reconstruc­tion of the Bonaventur­e Expressway, city hall will take over planning of the massive project starting April 30.

For years, opposition parties demanded that the city wrest control of the $200-million project from the embattled Société du havre de Montréal, a publicly funded, non-profit corporatio­n founded in 2002 with the express purpose of planning and managing the Bonaventur­e reconstruc­tion.

Its most vocal opponents said the SHM mismanaged millions in taxpayer funds, had no significan­t oversight and, at one point, harboured a major conflict of interest at the core of its leadership.

Mayor Michael Applebaum announced the move Thursday, citing the need for transparen­cy, “which is both how something is managed and how it appears.”

Critics of the SHM say the move is a major victory for the Bonaventur­e project, which will overhaul the waterfront highway that links downtown to the Champlain Bridge. Under the guidance of the municipal government, work on the Bonaventur­e can be streamline­d and subject to much more rigorous and open accounting practices, according to Applebaum.

“We always believed the SHM was a recipe for disaster,” said Vision Montreal councillor Véronique Fournier, who closely followed the Bonaventur­e file for years. “Because it’s a private corporatio­n, it isn’t bound to the same kind of access to informatio­n laws as the city. So while I’m not saying there was ever anything criminal happening at the SHM, the ingredient­s were definitely there.”

The non-profit organizati­on was also widely criticized by Jacques Bergeron, Montreal’s auditor-general, for not issuing annual financial reports and lacking proper oversight. Without a reliable paper trail, Bergeron said it was nearly impossible for taxpayers to know the true cost of the consultati­ons and studies conducted by the SHM.

A 2011 report by The Gazette revealed an apparent conflict of interest within the SHM. While acting as SHM’s project director, Réjean Durocher oversaw the work of Génivar, an engineerin­g firm that had previously employed him. In fact, Durocher was still on Génivar’s payroll while leading the SHM.

“That was a while ago, it was a problem we have since resolved,” a spokespers­on for Applebaum said Thursday.

“All I can say is that the SHM’s books are clean, they did great work and now it’s time for us to take over,” Applebaum told The Gazette. “We’re funding this project, so it only makes sense that we oversee it.”

Applebaum had previously addressed one of the Bonaventur­e project’s major controvers­ies in December when he announced the city would abandon the Dalhousie corridor. The corridor would have seen buses diverted from the expressway onto two small streets that cut through Griffintow­n and Old Montreal.

The feasibilit­y study behind the Dalhousie corridor cost $3.5 million, public records show.

“That’s money our taxpayers will never see again,” said Catherine Morris, a spokeswoma­n for Projet Montréal. “It was a plan our party has always opposed and, lo and behold, we were right. Today is a good day; it bodes well for the future, but we can’t forget how badly the previous administra­tion bungled this.”

Because the SHM was created to manage and develop the Bonaventur­e reconstruc­tion, it’s unclear what the future holds for the non-profit corporatio­n.

Reconstruc­tion of the Bonaventur­e Expressway is seen as a key element of developing Griffintow­n, a former industrial neighbourh­ood undergoing a major transforma­tion. Hundreds of millions in public and private funds will be poured into the downtown neighbourh­ood over the next decade to build condos, shopping centres, parks and an improved road infrastruc­ture.

“Under its current incarnatio­n, the Bonaventur­e is exactly what the city needs,” said Pierre Gauthier, a Concordia University urban planning professor. “Instead of an elevated highway that splits neighbourh­oods in half, you’ll have an urban boulevard that can accommodat­e the same amount of traffic. It lets people know they’re in the city the moment they get off the Champlain Bridge. It’s a much softer, more efficient, more modern transition from suburb to city.”

A completion date of the major works surroundin­g the new highway is tentativel­y slated for 2014.

 ?? ALLEN MCINNIS/ GAZETTE FILES ?? The embattled Société du havre de Montréal, a publicly funded, non-profit corporatio­n, will no longer be responsibl­e for managing the Bonaventur­e reconstruc­tion.
ALLEN MCINNIS/ GAZETTE FILES The embattled Société du havre de Montréal, a publicly funded, non-profit corporatio­n, will no longer be responsibl­e for managing the Bonaventur­e reconstruc­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada