Montreal Gazette

Nebraska lawsuit could stop Keystone

- WILLIAM MARSDEN

WASHINGTON — TransCanad­a Pipelines has spent almost $1 million lobbying Nebraska lawmakers who have passed special laws giving the governor almost exclusive power to approve the company’s Keystone XL pipeline route through the state, which he did this week.

The laws also give the governor power to expropriat­e land on behalf of TransCanad­a along the pipeline route.

But the Nebraska Supreme Court, this year will, hear a lawsuit that could overturn these laws and stop the $5.3-billion project in its tracks.

The overturnin­g of state law could have serious repercussi­ons on the expansion of Alberta’s oilsands production. This is what environmen­tal groups are gunning for because they view the oilsands expansion as a major contributo­r to climate change.

The Keystone XL will bring oilsands from Alberta and convention­al oil from the Bakken fields in Montana and North Dakota to Steel City, Neb. It will then link up with the $2.3-billion Gulf pipeline to refineries in Houston and Port Arthur, Texas.

Environmen­tal groups such as the Sierra Club and 350.org are promising civil disobedien­ce to stop the pipeline, which they say will serve as a catalyst to the expansion of the oilsands and the growth in its greenhouse gas emissions.

Widely cited here is a recent report by Calgary’s Pembina Instituted that states, “if approved, Keystone XL alone would require oilsands production to increase by 36 per cent” creating an additional 22.4 million tonnes of greenhouse gases. This is equivalent to “6.3 new coal-fired power plants or putting 4.6 million cars on the road.”

The lawsuit, filed in 2011 by citizens opposed to Keystone XL, claims that the new statutes unlawfully delegate to the governor powers over expropriat­ion — called “eminent domain” in the U.S. — and over pipeline routes that Nebraska’s constituti­on gives to other public bodies.

The lawyer for the citizen plaintiffs, Brian Jorde, said he believes the state supreme court will reach a decision this year. But if it is appealed, the case could take several more years before a final resolution.

Should the citizens win, TransCanad­a could have to go back to square one.

“If our suit is successful, then the route over where they would be acquiring this land would be in question and could potentiall­y end up not being the eventual route and all of that work could be for naught,” Jorde said.

A TransCanad­a spokesman, Shawn Howard, said, “We don’t believe that it’s valid.”

Under U.S. law, a company has to show that its project is beneficial to Nebraska cit- izens to invoke “eminent domain.”

To this end, TransCanad­a has made extravagan­t claims about the economic benefits of the pipeline. Based on a report by the Texas financial analysis firm, the Perryman Group, TransCanad­a has claimed that Keystone will create 20,000 direct jobs. The Perryman report itself claims the pipeline would lead to 250,000 to 553,000 jobs in the United States and annual economic gains of about $100 billion at current oil prices. The Perryman study states its estimates are based on informatio­n supplied by TransCanad­a.

The U.S. State Department disagrees. It says the project will create no more than 5,000 to 6,000 jobs, most of which will be “non-local and temporary.”

Jorde called the TransCanad­a job projection­s “bogus” and “embarrassi­ng.” He said the existing Keystone 1 pipeline in eastern Nevada created very few permanent jobs.

“We’re not benefiting in any real tangible way,” he said. “We are just collateral damage because we are in between Canada and Houston. Yet they are giving a private, for-profit company based in Canada the right to take Nebraskans’ land and that just doesn’t sit very well and it doesn’t sit very well in terms of how easily at was done.”

A non-profit organizati­on called Nebraskans for Jobs and Energy Independen­ce has been promoting the Keystone XL project to the public as a job creator since April 2011. Its website cites some of the figures in the Perryman report as well as presenting lots of laudatory informatio­n about TransCanad­a and Keystone.

The advocacy group’s original treasurer and secretary, Joseph Kohout, is a partner with the lobbying firm of Kissel/E&S Associates, in Omaha, Neb. Kissel has been lobbying the Nebraska legislatur­e on behalf of TransCanad­a and the Keystone project since 2006. Another founder was TransCanad­a employee and lobbyist Beth Jensen.

Howard denied any connection between TransCanad­a and Nebraskans for Jobs and added that Kohout and Jensen pulled out when TransCanad­a learned “it was an advocacy group.”

 ?? TREVOR JOHNSTON/ POSTMEDIA NEWS ?? The Keystone pipeline would bring oil from Alberta, Montana and North Dakota to Steel City, Neb.
TREVOR JOHNSTON/ POSTMEDIA NEWS The Keystone pipeline would bring oil from Alberta, Montana and North Dakota to Steel City, Neb.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada