Montreal Gazette

For Harper, it remains ‘all economy, all the time’

-

In promoting Joe Oliver and Greg Rickford simultaneo­usly to this government’s two most important portfolios, Finance and Natural Resources respective­ly, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has made a no-nonsense, unsurprisi­ng move that cements the Conservati­ves’ overwhelmi­ng strategic focus on resource extraction. It remains to be seen whether Oliver can display anything approachin­g outgoing finance minister Jim Flaherty’s common touch, especially in the critically important Greater Toronto hinterland and more broadly across Ontario.

Reporters covering the swearingin ceremony Wednesday were nonplussed by the perfunctor­y style of this rather important cabinet shuffle, with the three promotees — Ed Holder replaces Rickford as Minister of State for Science and Technology — being sworn-in to their new jobs with little fanfare and without anyone taking questions. This should not be mistaken for a lack of attention to public perception­s of the shuffle. When switching out a finance minister of Flaherty’s experience and profile, it makes tactical sense to pass the baton, if not invisibly, then with minimal fuss.

Doing so also allowed Oliver to duck, for now, the inevitable questions about where he stands on income-splitting, the government’s signature promise in the 2011 election, which Flaherty all but scuppered single-handedly in delivering his 2014 budget. It will be no surprise at all if the new finance minister, when he does eventually take questions, is firmly noncommitt­al on this subject. Expect him to say that the government absolutely will reduce the tax burden on hard-working Canadian families, unlike the profligate wastrels across the aisle, or something to that effect, and all options remain on the table. And that will be that, at least for a while.

After Flaherty’s bombshell — he said he thought income-splitting might not be such a grand idea, because it helps wealthier families disproport­ionately, which it does — there was a flurry of high-level leaks, all saying he and Prime Minister Stephen Harper were actually of one mind, income-splitting was indeed being re-evaluated, and the brief cacophony of conflictin­g statements from other senior ministers was all somehow part of this brilliant ploy. Late in February, the PM himself scuttled that line of thinking, when he briefly reiterated his support for income-splitting in the House of Commons.

The reality though is that it doesn’t hurt the Tories to leave some uncertaint­y hanging over this question, as they wait to get a better read on where Justin Trudeau’s Liberals will land on taxes. Flaherty, a street politician with very good instincts, was clearly aware of how incomespli­tting might be used by the Grits to portray the Tories as favouring the rich at the expense of the middle class. The social-conservati­ve aspect of this tax cut — that it makes it easier for one parent, who most often will be the mother, to work in the home — ensures its popularity with the true-blue wing of the Conservati­ve party. But Conservati­sm in Ontario is a different animal, more centrist. Flaherty understood this intuitivel­y; it remains to be seen whether Oliver does.

From a regional perspectiv­e, not a lot changes here; if anything the new regional mix is an improvemen­t. Rickford, the MP for Kenora, Ont., is a solid choice for Natural Resources; he was already the federal minister responsibl­e for the Ring of Fire mining belt in Northern Ontario (he retains this role) and also is very familiar with First Nations issues, having played a significan­t role on the government side during the Idle No More talks, when he was parliament­ary secretary to the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Developmen­t.

The big unknown is how much Oliver, at Finance, shifts this government rightward, and what effect that will have on its electoral prospects, particular­ly in middleof-the-road Ontario. Flaherty has long been among the Conservati­ves’ most moderate voices and Oliver, though much less outgoing than his predecesso­r, has gained a reputation as an ideologue, mainly because of his famous 2012 open letter, in which he castigated “environmen­tal and other radical groups” for blocking resource developmen­t. What is not in question is his profession­al suitabilit­y for the job — he’s a former executive director of the Ontario Securities Commission, former CEO of the Investment Dealers Associatio­n of Canada, a McGilltrai­ned lawyer and Harvard MBA.

Over and above all that, this shuffle reasserts, very plainly, the Harper government’s extractivi­st strategy, which it launched in earnest in 2012. Based on a brief conversati­on I had with Oliver last summer in Rankin Inlet, he quite sincerely believes that prosperity for Canada, and in particular for aboriginal Canadians, depends on ramped-up resource developmen­t. In Rickford he has a partner who knows that file. The two together, therefore represent a doubling down on the mantra of “all economy, all the time.”

 ?? MICHAEL
DEN TANDT ??
MICHAEL DEN TANDT

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada