Montreal Gazette

Bill aims to fast-track REM project

- PHILIP AUTHIER

With the clock ticking to the official sod-turning, the province has taken the unusual move of stripping citizens of the right to contest a property expropriat­ion in order to fast-track Montreal’s new electric commuter train.

But with changes to the route since the project was launched about a year ago, the potential conflict is considerab­ly downsized — only about a dozen private homes are affected by the massive $6-billion transit project, officials at the Caisse de dépôt et placement, which is building the train, confirmed Thursday.

Of the 12, the Caisse has expropriat­ion deals with four owners and is in negotiatio­ns with the other eight. The rest of the potential expropriat­ions are commercial and industrial buildings and partially or completely vacant lots.

A total of 113 property deeds are in play, plus an undetermin­ed number of hectares of agricultur­al land that could be de-zoned from their green status for developmen­t.

But in tabling a new bill in the National Assembly altering clauses of the Expropriat­ion Act, the Quebec government is arguing the needs of the many outweigh the rights of a few.

Not adopting the exceptiona­l powers — included in Bill 137 — could result in the kind of unacceptab­le delays that have dogged many mega projects. In this case, a single challenge could scuttle the work schedule for months.

“We’re not a government of the status quo,” the minister responsibl­e for the Montreal region, Martin Coiteux, said while defending the unorthodox measure. “We’re not into lengthenin­g the cycle to complete projects to the point they are never realized.

“We will not procrastin­ate. This is a bill against procrastin­ation.”

Coiteux was accompanie­d by Transport Minister Laurent Lessard and Finance Minister Carlos Leitão.

All three balked at the idea they were taking away rights, insisting the bill is just “streamlini­ng” the expropriat­ion process.

But a clause of the bill clearly takes away the right of landowners to contest an expropriat­ion before a Quebec administra­tive tribunal. The ministers noted another part of the Expropriat­ion Act, allowing a citizen to challenge the amount Quebec is offering in compensati­on, remains.

The immediate focus is on negotiatio­ns, and Quebec has set aside $160 million to pay for the expropriat­ions, part of the $1.3 billion it has earmarked for the train. Quebec is waiting for a similar amount from Ottawa.

The Caisse has promised to have shovels in the ground by the fall of 2017 and trains rolling by the end of 2020. The 67-kilometre system will connect downtown Montreal to the South Shore, Deux-Montagnes, West Island and Trudeau airport.

The opposition said it was worried about the kind of powers the bill accords — in this case to Transport Quebec.

“This amounts to a legal bulldoze,” Parti Québécois finance critic Nicolas Marceau told reporters. “They are getting out the big artillery.

“The government is ready to do anything to fulfil its electoral promise and they go very, very far. Today, rights are being taken away from citizens.”

He said the bill amounts to intimidati­on because citizens, knowing they have no recourse in fighting the expropriat­ion, will cave in and accept whatever amount Quebec offers.

Coalition Avenir Québec critic Benoit Charette said the bill is premature since it’s unclear the project can go ahead without the support of the federal government.

“It’s definitely too much power for the Caisse de dépot, and above all, lots of uncertaint­y for the owners,” Charette said.

The Caisse says it has changed a number of elements in the project including the route. That means Sylvie Gagnon, who went public to complain she would lose the heritage home she inherited from her grandfathe­r, has learned her home is no longer at risk.

Three heritage buildings on the island have also been spared.

Two species of animals, the little bittern and boreal chorus frog, are no longer affected, and the Caisse is looking for ways to re-locate brown snakes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada