Montreal Gazette

Quebec Liberals’ anti-niqab bill is bad policy and bad politics

Like Bill 62, new amendments are bad policy, bad politics

- DON MACPHERSON dmacpgaz@gmail.com Twitter: DMacpGaz

Batman will not sit in the Quebec National Assembly.

This would be the effect of one of the amendments to the Couillard government’s proposed anti-niqab legislatio­n announced this week. Bill 62, targeting Muslim women who wear facial veils, would ban giving or receiving public services with the face concealed. The amendment would extend the ban to MNAs, municipal councillor­s and school commission­ers.

That Quebecers would choose a masked candidate to represent them is almost as hypothetic­al as the fictional cowled crusader leaving Gotham City for this province, acquiring citizenshi­p, and running for office here on his record as a crimefight­er. But then so was the possibilit­y of a niqabi seeking employment in a public service.

Still, one can’t be too careful. That appears to be the thinking of the “bare-face” bill’s sponsor, Justice Minister Stéphanie Vallée, to the extent she has thought about the bill at all.

Another of her proposed amendments would extend the original ban from the provincial public services to municipal ones, and to public transit. When a reporter asked Vallée the reasonable question of whether this would stop a woman wearing a veil from taking the bus, the minister was unwilling, or perhaps unable, to answer.

Her amendments would make what was already a bad bill even worse.

Bill 62 stigmatize­s the tiny number of Muslim women in Quebec who wear facial veils. It encourages their persecutio­n, like the harassment of women wearing Muslim head scarves during the debate on the former Parti Québécois government’s ill-fated “charter of values.”

It would enshrine in legislatio­n the hypocrisy of Quebec’s “Catho-laïcité,” or Catho-secularism. One of Vallée’s amendments pretends that Quebec’s public institutio­ns are founded on the separation of church and state, while the bill would preserve the crucifix placed in the Assembly to symbolize an alliance between the two.

The government pretends that the ban on face coverings in general does not discrimina­te on religious grounds. But its intent is given away by the fact that the ban is contained in a bill to restrict religious accommodat­ions.

And the bill is useless, not only because it addresses imaginary problems, but also because its guidelines for handling accommodat­ion requests are so general.

Not only is the bill bad policy, it’s bad politics, another demonstrat­ion of the sheer political stupidity of the Couillard Liberals.

It won’t achieve its political objective of settling the accommodat­ions issue once and for all before the general election due by October 2018. The Liberals’ relatively feeble entry in the competitio­n to defend the majority against the undesirabl­es in their midst doesn’t go nearly far enough to satisfy the nationalis­t opposition parties.

It is neverthele­ss useful to them. Since it was presented by Quebec’s most diverse and least nationalis­t party, it gives political legitimacy to the restrictio­n of minority rights.

Bill 62 is the Couillard government’s version of Bill 22, adopted in 1974 by Robert Bourassa’s Liberal government. As the first Quebec legislatio­n restrictin­g minority language rights, Bill 22 enabled the succeeding PQ government’s more draconian Bill 101.

Originally, Premier Philippe Couillard intended to get the accommodat­ions debate over with at the beginning of his term. Instead, his government squandered its time, and begins the pre-election year fighting on ground favouring its adversarie­s.

Couillard continues to entrust that fight to a minister who has already shown she’s not up to it. Listening to Vallée’s poorly prepared news conference on her amendments this week was like watching somebody juggling blindfolde­d with running chainsaws.

The PQ and the Coalition Avenir Québec party, vying for position as the leading alternativ­e to the Liberals in the election, can be expected to prolong the debate on the bill in the Assembly as much as possible.

And on his other side, Couillard was forced to back Vallée against Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre, who indicated the province’s metropolis will defy her legislatio­n.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada