Montreal Gazette

Where parties stand on infrastruc­ture question

Leading up to municipal elections on Nov. 5, we look at influentia­l factors in the Montreal race. Today: infrastruc­ture

- RENÉ BRUEMMER rbruemmer@postmedia.com twitter.com/renebruemm­er

For decades, the sorry state of Montreal’s infrastruc­ture was much like the old joke about the weather: Everybody complained about it, but nobody did anything about it.

Today, there’s no question the city is finally moving on repairing its rotting water pipes and crumbling roads. But the complainin­g hasn’t stopped.

After suffering through another summer and fall trapped in traffic amid a labyrinth of orange cones and detours, Montrealer­s’ frustratio­ns have shifted from the government’s inaction to how the repairs are being handled.

“We don’t question there’s an infrastruc­ture deficit we must attack,” said Sylvain Ouellet, infrastruc­ture critic for opposition party Projet Montréal. “But we have a lot of criticism of the way in which it was done.

“There’s a problem with the quality of the work and the fact there are almost no inspectors on site,” not to mention the traffic and public security issues caused by constructi­on sites, he said.

With Montreal’s ubiquitous traffic congestion replacing weather as the city’s top conversati­on starter, it’s no surprise one of Projet Montréal’s earliest and most popular election planks was the promise of better planning to end “monster traffic jams.”

“The management of the constructi­on work in Montreal just makes no sense,” Ouellet said.

In 2013, Montreal’s auditor general issued grave warnings about the conditions of Montreal’s 6,000 kilometres of roads and 9,000 kilometres of water mains and sewage pipes.

Years of neglect that caused minor problems to swell into major ones have left the city “near the point of no return.”

Recurring sinkholes, one of which swallowed a backhoe on Ste-Catherine St. in 2013, helped reinforce the message. In the 1990s, the city spent $8 million a year repairing and updating its water systems as opposed to the $200 million needed, the auditor general said.

The administra­tion of incumbent mayor Denis Coderre responded with an aggressive 10year, $6.9-billion plan.

This year, the city is spending a record $600 million to repair its waterworks.

Result: The percentage of water lost through leakage has dropped from 40 per cent in 2003 to about 27 per cent today, says Lionel Perez, the city’s executive committee member responsibl­e for infrastruc­ture.

The city has invested in detailed analyses to determine the state of its roads and pipes to ensure costeffici­ent repairs and is obtaining data to monitor what work is being done and track the costs.

Crackdowns on the widespread collusion in the constructi­on industry and monitoring of contracts by the city’s new inspector general department means the city is getting more bidders and lower prices, Perez said.

Entreprene­urs who receive poor quality reviews are being barred from bidding. The city has gone from an average of 70 kilometres a year in road repairs to nearly 300 kilometres this year, Perez said.

“After a couple years of all these investment­s people are noticing the results and starting to see the tide is turning,” Perez said.

Frustratio­n with traffic issues is understand­able, he said, but with 400 to 500 work sites annually in the city — many of them organized by provincial or federal authoritie­s — the boroughs or the private sector, some disruption is inevitable, he said.

Richard Shearmur, a professor with McGill University’s school of urban planning, says Montreal is hamstrung by poor communicat­ions and a lack of collaborat­ion with higher levels of government.

“There are three different bodies investing in infrastruc­ture at the same time and they are not always co-ordinated and I think that’s where there are some very real problems with infrastruc­ture work happening right now,” he said.

A continued lack of oversight by independen­t inspectors, noted by the auditor general and raised during the Charbonnea­u Commission, is also a serious concern.

“It’s great we’re investing all this money, but are we actually getting value for the money in terms of quality of engineerin­g and materials used?” Shearmur asked. “The whole problem of the Champlain Bridge was due to the quality of the initial constructi­on.”

The city’s contention it has been working closely with business owners and street associatio­ns to offset constructi­on-related business disruption­s is countered by multitudes of merchants who say they were never consulted, Ouellet said.

Coderre recently told the Montreal Gazette the city will aid affected merchants with some form of subsidies in its next mandate. The traffic pain should ease considerab­ly by 2020, he said. That’s when work on the Turcot Interchang­e is to be completed, while the new Champlain Bridge is to be finished in 2018.

“It’s the right thing to do and the responsibl­e thing to do, if not necessaril­y the popular thing to do, but in the end it will benefit Montrealer­s,” Perez said.

He rejects accusation­s of engaging in “electoral paving,” saying the kilometres of surface patching the city has been doing is designed to tide over badly corroded roads slated for major repairs in five to 10 years.

There’s little doubt the level of activity has put pressure on contractor demand and in turn raised prices, said Dany Fougères, a professor of history at the Université du Quebec à Montréal who researched Montreal’s traffic infrastruc­ture.

If it’s any consolatio­n, he said, infrastruc­ture woes and pledges are nothing new.

“Since the foundation of this marvellous country, it has been built on the promise of infrastruc­ture, be it canals or train tracks or gas lighting,” he said.

“When they promise to solve a problem, when they promise a new future, it is always done on the back of infrastruc­ture.”

WHERE THE PARTIES STAND

Équipe Denis Coderre:

Much of the party’s infrastruc­ture platform refers to changes made during its tenure over the last four years, like demolishin­g the Bonaventur­e Expressway and replacing it with Robert-Bourassa Blvd. It also cites legacy projects conducted under the banner of Montreal’s 375th anniversar­y, including covering the Ville Marie Expressway near city hall (still ongoing) and rebuilding Viger Square (still ongoing). Future plans include:

Continued investment to upgrade 5,100 kilometres of roads and water pipelines over the next 10 years, while improving practices to limit inconvenie­nces and business disruption­s;

Implementi­ng party’s downtown strategy, which includes increasing transit offerings to the downtown core by 100,000 trips a day; creating four new elementary schools and a high school; adding 1,000 residentia­l units of three or more bedrooms, many of them affordable housing;

Rebuild and redevelop Ste-Catherine St. W. downtown. Projet Montréal:

Promises to reduce constructi­on on streets by ensuring projects that are co-ordinated among all public services;

Establish standards for constructi­on site management to minimize impacts on the local environmen­t and ensure the safety of citizens;

Modify tenders to ensure work sites are not left without workers for several days;

Take into account respect for deadlines, quality of work and reduction of work site nuisances in evaluating the performanc­e of managers;

Accelerate repair of water-related infrastruc­ture;

Aim to eliminate sewer overflows into the St. Lawrence River.

 ?? DARIO AYALA FILES ?? Workers survey the scene at Ste-Catherine and Guy Sts. in August 2013, when a sinkhole swallowed a backhoe. That same year, Montreal’s auditor general issued grave warnings about the condition of the city’s streets, water mains and sewage pipes.
DARIO AYALA FILES Workers survey the scene at Ste-Catherine and Guy Sts. in August 2013, when a sinkhole swallowed a backhoe. That same year, Montreal’s auditor general issued grave warnings about the condition of the city’s streets, water mains and sewage pipes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada