Montreal Gazette

PROTEIN AND PROFIT

The hype behind ‘activated’ nuts

- JOE SCHWARCZ joe.schwarcz@mcgill.ca Joe Schwarcz is director of McGill University’s Office for Science & Society (mcgill.ca/oss). He hosts The Dr. Joe Show on CJAD Radio 800 AM every Sunday from 3 to 4 p.m.

The question took me by surprise. “Do you really have to activate your nuts?” Just as a plethora of strange mental images began to bubble through my mind, I learned that we were talking about tree nuts.

“Activation” does not refer to poking sleeping nuts; it refers to soaking and then drying raw varieties before consuming them. The aim is to increase nutritiona­l value. And profit margins for processors.

Although “activated” on the label is synonymous with “expensive,” affluent health conscious consumers have made bags of activated nuts trendy. Are they activating anything other than cash registers?

The hype of especially “healthy” foods is rarely corroborat­ed by science, but there is usually a kernel of truth that is germinated and then fertilized with cherry-picked data to yield a crop of questionab­le value. “Activated nuts” follow this pattern.

Nuts are the seeds of plants and are equipped with the nutrients needed for plant growth, including a host of proteins, fats, starches, minerals, vitamins, sterols and protease inhibitors — all needed for a seed to germinate and go on to produce a plant.

Sterols are essential components of plant membranes and protease inhibitors are proteins produced by plants to protect themselves from insects by interferin­g with the action of proteases, enzymes insects use to digest plants they have dined on. Basically they give insects a tummy ache. But protease inhibitors can also interfere with human digestion. Soaking leaches them out, reducing the problem.

One of the essential elements needed for plant growth is phosphorus, which seeds store as a component of a compound called phytic acid. However, phytic acid can also bind essential minerals such as iron, magnesium, calcium and zinc that may be present in food, preventing them from being absorbed into the bloodstrea­m during digestion. Phytic acid is also found in beans, grains and various seeds, meaning that a high consumptio­n of these can result in mineral deficiency. But soaking beans and nuts unleashes a host of chemical reactions that collective­ly are referred to as “germinatio­n.” Enzymes called phytases are generated to break down phytic acid and release phosphorus, as well as any bound minerals for easier absorption.

All this suggests that “activation” by soaking beans, grains and nuts improves their nutritiona­l value. But there is another side to phytic acid and phytates, the term for compounds in which minerals are bound to phytic acid. They have purported health benefits, so there may be a consequenc­e to eliminatin­g them from the diet.

One of the risk factors for colon cancer is too high an iron intake, linked to high meat consumptio­n. Vegetarian­s have a lower rate of colon cancer and one suggestion has been that they are protected by their intake of phytic acid that ends up reducing iron absorption. So, should we listen to the Paleo community that tells us that phytic acid is an “anti-nutrient,” and that foods containing it should be shunned, to the “nut activators” who claim that soaking nuts makes them healthier by eliminatin­g phytic acid, or to researcher­s who have linked phytic acid to reduced risk of cancer as well as diabetes, kidney stone formation and heart disease?

What about supplement manufactur­ers who market inositol hexaphosph­ate, another term for phytic acid, with oblique suggestion­s of efficacy in the treatment of cancer, heart disease, depression and side effects of chemothera­py based on some inconclusi­ve, preliminar­y experiment­s?

Each of these positions can be supported by selective reporting of data, but the bottom line is that neither phytic acid nor phytates are drugs or poisons, and for the vast majority of the public their presence or absence in nuts is irrelevant. We do not rely on nuts as our sole source of minerals or of phytic acid and a balanced diet will provide adequate amounts of both.

In any case, the nuts we consume are not truly “raw.” They have been either roasted or blanched to inactivate natural toxins, and in the process their phytic content has been significan­tly reduced and soaking provides no further benefit.

Nuts, whether activated or not, can make a valuable contributi­on to the diet. A number of studies have shown a reduced incidence of heart disease and gallstone formation associated with nut consumptio­n. There have also been trends toward reduced risk of hypertensi­on, cancer and inflammati­on.

Interventi­onal studies have shown that nuts can have a cholestero­l reducing effect, likely due to their sterol content. Sterols have a chemical similarity to cholestero­l and can block cholestero­l absorption. Contrary to expectatio­ns, epidemiolo­gic studies and clinical trials suggest that nuts — despite their high fat content — are unlikely to contribute to obesity and may even help in weight loss.

Just about the only health issue is the possibilit­y of an allergic reaction. And there is another bonus with nuts. They taste good. I buy the roasted, unsalted variety. They are active enough for me.

 ??  ??
 ?? RICHARD ARLESS JR. ?? Nuts, activated or not, can make a valuable contributi­on to the diet, Joe Schwarcz writes.
RICHARD ARLESS JR. Nuts, activated or not, can make a valuable contributi­on to the diet, Joe Schwarcz writes.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada