Montreal Gazette

Dancing with stars

Suspiria remake sautés and lands with a dull thud

- TINA HASSANNIA

With politics, history and feminism shoehorned into a narrative more tightly constraine­d than a pair of ill-fitting dance shoes, Suspiria, the remake of Dario Argento’s 1977 cult classic, is a loud thud of a movie. Sure, it’s still punctuated by the thumpthump­ing sounds of witchy heels echoing through labyrinthi­ne corridors as in the original. But the dense sound of Luca Guadagnino’s remake registers little suspense and mystery.

Argento’s masterpiec­e is a mash-up of occult obsessions, a saturated-colour palette and other gory, gushy Giallo gems. It chronicles the detective work of an U.S. ballet student (Jane Harper), who finds an undergroun­d coven of witches responsibl­e for her German dance-school’s string of inexplicab­le deaths and horrors. Jugular-chewing dogs, ornate, colourful chambers which serve little purpose, and an inimitable hair-raising score by prog-rock band Goblin all give shape to Argento’s film. The story doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, but that aligns with the Italian filmmaker’s vision of style over substance. Its simplicity is well-earned.

By contrast, fellow countryman Guadagnino is a soulful, earthy filmmaker, best known for the Oscar-award-winning film Call Me by Your Name. Given that Suspiria is one of the most visually distinct movies ever made, it’s obvious Guadagnino worked very hard to ensure the remake looks and feels nothing like it. It’s all muddy, muted colours, which serve its setting of 1977 Berlin quite well, as East-West tensions paint a historical­ly facile backdrop intended to imbue Suspiria with more doom and gloom than it can handle.

Tilda Swinton plays haughty, visionary dance instructor Madame Blanc who finds a rare talent in new red-haired American student Susie (Dakota Johnson) at the Markos Dance Academy. Meanwhile, elderly psychiatri­st Dr. Josef Klemperer (Swinton again) takes over the role of detective as he tries to piece together the scribbled ramblings of his missing patient, dance student Patricia (Chloë Grace Moretz).

Later in the film, he’s traumatize­d for life and told off for never believing in his patients’ delusions, which tragically ruined his love life. Yet one can’t help but feel like this is a last-minute throwaway subplot intended to make the movie somehow more feminist, by pointing out his profession­al gaslightin­g. Unlike in the original, Susie actually welcomes the attention from her hero, Blanc, and ignores all the strange occurrence­s in the studio. She is the chosen one, and all the other girls must suffer.

The biggest and best departure from Argento’s film is the use of dance, though it’s still only employed half-heartedly. The film hints at a couple of ideas: that perfecting, exacting art, as depicted by Twinkle Toes Susie and her intense rehearsals with Blanc, can make rival peers become ugly in contrast, and that her youthful vigour is a source of nourishmen­t for the old witches of the academy. But where does the film go with this, exactly? Nowhere that makes sense, nowhere that satisfies.

Once the ritualisti­c dancing ceases to pulsate and the risible fountains of blood spurting out of magically opened wounds have run dry, what remains? The film’s unplumbed ideas and themes unravel into multiple narrative threads. Thanks to its glamorous cast and contempora­ry trendsetti­ng — the refined, autumnal dancewear is quite chic — it is sure to inspire a new generation to take up dance or witchcraft, or both.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada