Montreal Gazette

Hockey Canada brass just didn't get it

Organizati­on provided a textbook example of how not to manage a crisis, Paul Deegan says.

- Paul Deegan was a public and government relations executive at BMO Financial Group and CN.

In June 2018, a woman was allegedly sexually assaulted by eight hockey players, including members of Canada's world junior team. Serious questions have been raised about the thoroughne­ss of London Police Service's investigat­ion, which concluded without charges, and Hockey Canada's own third-party investigat­ion. Since then, Hockey Canada has said members of its 2003 men's world junior hockey championsh­ip team are being investigat­ed for a group sexual assault. The women, and indeed all Canadians, deserve answers.

In any crisis, there are three approaches: bury your head in the sand in the hope that other events will overtake the news cycle; double down and defend what may be perceived as indefensib­le; or be transparen­t and accountabl­e. The Canadian exemplar of the final approach was Michael Mccain, whose company Maple Leaf Foods was rocked by a listeriosi­s outbreak at one of its packaged meat plants in 2008. Twenty-three people died and another 57 became very ill. Mccain shunned the advice from lawyers and assumed accountabi­lity. As a result, his personal reputation was burnished, rather than destroyed.

In sharp contrast, Hockey Canada's handling of this crisis, like that of the WE charity scandal, will go down in history as a textbook example of how not to manage through a crisis. WE, in 2020, was awarded a sole-source federal contract to administer the $900-million Canada Student Summer Grant program in a hurried fashion and amid claims of cronyism and complex corporate structures.

There are strong parallels between both crises, where both organizati­ons scored repeatedly on their own net.

First, both Hockey Canada and WE were not sufficient­ly transparen­t or speedy in their communicat­ions with media, government and Canadians. In both cases, questions have been raised about financial controls and management, where the flow of some funds appeared far too opaque.

Second, leaders of both organizati­ons adopted a combative and intransige­nt stance. Appearing before a parliament­ary committee can be an unnerving experience, but politician­s, like the Canadians they represent, are generally fair-minded and want to get to the truth. While representa­tives of both organizati­ons seemed highly “coached,” they appeared out of touch with the gravity of the situation and, at times, came across as disrespect­ful to our parliament­arians and insulting to all Canadians.

Third, both organizati­ons misjudged the doggedness of reporters and the thoroughne­ss of their investigat­ion, and how the news coverage would compel parliament­arians to act.

Fourth, both organizati­ons were adept at attracting bluechip sponsors and partners. Yet, when troubling signs emerged, corporate sponsors and government alike were too slow to sever ties. Corporate shareholde­rs and taxpayers expect a level of transparen­cy and accountabi­lity, which was lacking in both cases. Neither sponsors nor government used their considerab­le leverage enough to exact swift governance and management change. Simply put, the gong show went on far too long.

Through their arrogance and crisis mismanagem­ent, each organizati­on turned a serious issue that — while difficult, should have been manageable — into a fullblown existentia­l crisis.

Poor executive management and weak boards, whether in the corporate or not-forprofit worlds, are a recipe for plodding underperfo­rmance at the best of times and a ticket to ruin during a crisis.

Hockey Canada's recent lashing out at the media was naive and pathetic. Reporters and editors strive to be fair and balanced. Hockey Canada's blame game may have been a last-ditch attempt at self-preservati­on, but its obfuscatio­n and attempt to distract led it quickly down an irreversib­le path of self-destructio­n.

Simply put, Hockey Canada's board and executive team didn't get it, and they lost their moral authority to lead our national game. They were the problem. Let's hope the new board can speak plainly, demonstrat­e accountabi­lity, clean up the toxic “bro” culture, hire a strong CEO, re-earn the trust of the hockey family and all Canadians, and deliver a gold medal winning performanc­e — both on and off the ice at the 2023 World Junior Ice Hockey Championsh­ips in Halifax.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada