National Post - Financial Post Magazine

Indirect tax pain

CRA dings shareholde­r for relative’s benefits

-

It may be quite tempting as a small business owner to pay various personal expenses out of your corporatio­n’s income. Needless to say, such expenses would not be tax deductible unless incurred for legitimate purposes to earn business income. In addition, depending on who receives them, an employee or shareholde­r benefit can also be assessed by the Canada Revenue Agency.

This past summer, the CRA was asked whether a company could legitimate­ly pay for the university tuition and living expenses of a company shareholde­r’s relative who was neither an employee nor shareholde­r of the corporatio­n.

The Income Tax Act states that no expense is deductible in computing a corporatio­n’s business income unless it was incurred for the purpose of earning income. The Act further denies the deduction of any personal or living expenses. The CRA responded that, based on its understand­ing of the facts, the amounts paid by the corporatio­n to the shareholde­r’s relative were “personal or living expenses and have not been incurred by the corporatio­n for the purpose of gaining or producing income.” As a result, the expenses associated with paying the relative’s tuition and living expenses would not be deductible.

But paying the expenses of a relative has even worse implicatio­ns for the shareholde­r because of shareholde­r benefit rules. Under these rules, if a benefit, such as free tuition, is conferred by a corporatio­n on a shareholde­r, then the amount or value of that benefit must be included in the shareholde­r’s taxable income for the year, with only a few, very narrow exceptions. In this situation, the benefit was conferred not on the corporatio­n’s shareholde­r, but on his relative. Nonetheles­s, the indirect payment rule comes into effect, which would still consider the shareholde­r to have received a taxable benefit equal to the amount of the tuition or living expenses received by his relative.

Note that the rules are quite different when an arm’s length employer provides a post-secondary scholarshi­p, bursary or free tuition to family members of an employee under a scholarshi­p program. In such a situation, the amount can generally be received by the student as a tax-exempt scholarshi­p. To get this tax result, however, there must be “objective selection criteria that focus on the accomplish­ments of the... child of the employee/minor shareholde­r (and) the scholarshi­p program would need to available to children of all employees, not just the children of key employees/shareholde­rs.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada