National Post

The truth about sex slavery

- ROBERT FULFORD

Brothels

traditiona­lly evoked, at least

in the arts, a certain glamour. They sounded, to those of us who have never visited one, like places of enchantmen­t: Louis Armstrong plays in the background if we’re in New Orleans, Toulouse- Lautrec makes sketches if we’re in Paris. Upstairs a sympatheti­c prostitute, from a Guy de Maupassant story, tactfully conducts a young man’s sexual initiation as a favour to his father. The myth has always been light- hearted.

But there’s nothing light- hearted about the word “ brothel” when it appears in the news today. Journalist­s describe brothels all over the world filled with slave prostitute­s. Recruiters entice impoverish­ed women across borders with promises of jobs as waitresses or hotel workers, then sell them to pimps. They live desperate and brutalized lives, prevented from escaping, often beaten, having sex with 10 or 15 men a day. Organizati­ons, including the UN and the U.S. State Department, publicize their misery.

Since it happens in secret, enforced prostituti­on can’t be quantified, though various organizati­ons try. The Internatio­nal Office of Migration says 400,000 now endure this life but you can find much higher numbers: Clare Nolan, a Roman Catholic nun and a campaigner in this field, has said that every year somewhere between 700,000 and two-million women and girls leave their home countries and enter this special version of hell.

Ric Esther Bienstock, in her excellent 90-minute documentar­y, Sex Slaves (it ran on CBC last week and will later appear on PBS and Channel 4 in Britain), ignores most of the big numbers and concentrat­es on a few victims and victimizer­s. At the centre of her film is a Moldovan woman named Katia who, on a trip to Turkey to buy products for her mother’s market stall, discovers that Vlad, a man who has been helping her, is a whore-trader. He sells her to a pimp, who quickly sells her to another pimp. Her Ukrainian husband goes to Turkey (followed by Bienstock’s camera) to pose as a trader and buy her back. Eventually she gets out and the trader pleads guilty to kidnapping. Thanks to a suspicious­ly kind judge in Moldova, he gets a suspended sentence.

Vlad then gives Bienstock a long interview about what he did, believed to be the first such on-camera confession ever. (“The amount depended on Katia’s looks. I was paid US$1,000. That’s how they evaluated Katia.”) Bienstock adroitly inserts pieces of Vlad throughout the film, a clever move. Unutterabl­y sleazy, he sets the tone, acting as a kind of perverse commentato­r.

Bienstock tells the story straight, without shading. As she acknowledg­es, grey areas don’t work well in films. But this is an arena of opinion that’s strewn with ambiguitie­s. While clearly appalling, the story is not so one-dimensiona­l as Bienstock’s film and most articles suggest. There’s a counter-narrative abroad. No doubt many women are mistreated, but their stories are far too similar to be automatica­lly believed. They always claim they were totally unaware of why they were recruited. It seems always to astound them that they have to work as prostitute­s.

Such purported shock is nonsense, says Phelim McAleer of the Financial Times, writing last April in The Spectator. McAleer quotes Andy Felton, a British police officer who works in Romania on a Romanian-British program to stem illegal immigratio­n into the U.K. “Some are tricked,” Felton says, “ but the overwhelmi­ng majority of girls understand before they leave that they will be working in prostituti­on.”

Most were seasoned prostitute­s in Romania and if sent home go back to prostituti­on. To believe they are conned, you have to believe they are idiots who never discuss emigration with other women and never notice the many stories on forced prostituti­on in newspapers and on TV. But women in a place like Moldova, a former Soviet province, face poverty so oppressive that they are willing to risk falling into the hands of monsters.

William F. McDonald, a Georgetown University scholar, noted in a recent paper that the campaign against the internatio­nal sex industry rests now on a “central image of the nice girl forced into sexual exploitati­on,” which may not survive the accumulati­on of better empirical data.

Tom Axworthy, of the Centre for the Study of Democracy at Queen’s University, wrote last week in the Toronto Star that in size the sex trade has become a larger crime than pre- Civil War slavery. He wants Canada to help lead an internatio­nal campaign to fight it. That task will be extremely hard, maybe impossible; but it will almost certainly require a more realistic assessment than the problem has been given so far.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada