National Post

Doping police on full alert

IOC, organizers set to conduct over 5,000 tests The more cheats we can catch is the better for clean athletes

- BY STEPHEN WILSON

Before a starting gun has been fired or a medal awarded, one of the most intense competitio­ns of the London Olympics is already being waged behind the scenes.

From training grounds across the world, to rooms in the athletes village, to border checkpoint­s around the U.K., the cat-and-mouse game between drug cheats and the doping police is in full swing.

The goal: to deter or catch dopers before they line up to compete. And those who slip through the pre-games crackdown will face the most extensive ant-doping program in Olympic history, with more tests and more advanced testing techniques.

“The more cheats we can catch is the better for the clean athletes,” IOC president Jacques Rogge told The Associated Press.

The IOC and London organizers will be conducting more than 5,000 urine and blood tests overall, up from 4,770 in Beijing four years ago. Nearly 40 percent of the tests are being carried out before the games start on July 27 to try to nab athletes when they’re more likely to be doping.

During the games, which run until Aug. 12, the top five finishers — plus two other athletes chosen at random — will be tested. Athletes are also subject to surprise outof-competitio­n controls at any time and any place. Samples will again be saved for eight years to allow for retroactiv­e testing.

“I think it’s the tightest net we have ever had,” IOC vice president Thomas Bach said.

The official Olympic testing program went into effect on Monday with the opening of the athletes village.

A nondescrip­t building in the northern suburb of Harlow houses the doping lab where an athlete’s reputation can be ruined by a positive result. The lab — operated by GlaxoSmith­Kline and headed by Professor David Cowan of the Drug Control Center at King’s College, London — will operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and test up to 400 samples a day for more than 240 banned substances.

The IOC will act quickly on any positive results, setting up a disciplina­ry committee to investigat­e and hold a hearing. If found guilty of doping, athletes face disqualifi­cation from the games, loss of any medals and public shame.

The 2004 Athens Olympics produced the highest number of doping cases at any games — 26, more than double the previous high of 12 in Los Angeles in 1984. Six medalists, including two gold winners, were caught in Athens from among 3,600 tests.

That number could still rise: IOC medical commission chairman Arne Ljungqvist told the AP this week that he is investigat­ing up to five suspected positive results uncovered in the recent retesting of Athens samples.

In Beijing four years ago, there were 14 positive tests among athletes and six among horses in the equestrian competitio­n. Later, retests of the Beijing samples caught five more athletes for use of CERA, an advanced version of the blood-boosting drug EPO. Rashid Ramzi of Bahrain was retroactiv­ely stripped of his gold medal in the 1,500 meters.

“The fact that people know that samples can be analyzed again is a big deterrent,” Ljungqvist said. “If athletes don’t get caught now they may be caught tomorrow.”

Ljungqvist said the quality of the testing has also advanced, with more sensitive techniques to detect the steroids, stimulants, hormones and other chemicals used to enhance performanc­e. The detection window for human growth hormone and other drugs has improved so the use of drugs can be traced back more than a couple of days.

“We have widened the window steadily,” Ljungqvist said.

How clean will be the London Games be?

“I have no crystal ball,” Rogge said. “We have a stronger policy than in the past. It could be that we catch more cheats than in the past, but it could be also that the deterrent effect is big enough to stop many of them.”

Parkinson, the UKAD chief executive, said ultimately it depends on the athletes more than the testers.

“There is only so much we can do,” he said. “We have to recognize that some athletes may want to cross the line and cheat during the games. We want everyone standing on the podium to be proud of being a clean athlete and not have any person question their performanc­e.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada