National Post

GAS PLANT TAB TOPS $1B

Liberals had cheaper options, AG report finds

- Scott StinSon Analysis from Toronto

The gas-plant scandal that has plagued Kathleen Wynne’s first eight months in the premier’s office was made significan­tly worse on Tuesday with an Auditor-General’s report that suggested the cost to the public of cancelling and relocating the Oakville plant could run as high as $815-million, or about 20 times more than the governing Liberals originally claimed, bringing the total tab for cancelling two plants to an estimated $1.1-billion.

Citing a number of “questionab­le” decisions by the government of former premier Dalton McGuinty, which decided to scrap the Oakville plant in the run-up to the 2011 election amid strong local opposition, Bonnie Lysyk’s report describes a government that repeatedly made choices that would increase the final bill, including promising the developer, Alberta-based TransCanad­a Energy, that it would be “made whole” in the event of a cancellati­on, and ordering the power authority to locate a replacemen­t facility in Napanee, which added close to $600-million in additional gas-delivery costs to a site more than 200 kilometres away.

Ms. Wynne said, as a member of the cabinet that made the decisions, she “takes full responsibi­lity and I offer a full apology.”

“It should never have happened,” she said. “It was a big mistake.”

The Premier also said the province would implement new rules around the siting of large energy projects, and she would seek “new rules limiting political staff involvemen­t in commercial, third-party transactio­ns.” The latter decision is a response to revelation­s that staffers in the former premier’s office were directly involved in the gas-plant settlement discussion­s.

As with the April AuditorGen­eral’s report on the Mississaug­a gas-plant cancellati­on, which also significan­tly increased the costs to the public above those announced by the Liberals, the Oakville report says that a considerab­le amount of the costs will be borne by electricit­y ratepayers. The power authority now has to deliver gas to Napanee and transmit power back to where it is needed.

When the Liberal government said last year that the costs of the dual cancellati­ons would total $235-million, it was speaking only of the sunk costs that would have to be repaid by taxpayers. Former government staffers have since acknowledg­ed that the McGuinty government chose to avoid discussing the much higher cost to ratepayers. On Tuesday, opposition politician­s accused the Liberals of “hiding $1-billion,” with PC energy critic Lisa McLeod calling on Ms. Wynne to resign. The PCs also renewed calls for a full judicial inquiry. NDP leader Andrea Horwath said the public will be disappoint­ed by the waste of money, but she said she would not immediatel­y seek to topple the minority Liberal government.

In many ways, Tuesday’s report confirmed what has been known about the gas-plant controvers­y for more than a year: poorly sited facilities that were part of a poorly conceived energy plan, followed by two politicall­y motivated decisions that were executed either with no awareness of the costs to be borne by taxpayers and electricit­y ratepayers — or with some awareness of the costs, but total disregard for them.

Staggering incompeten­ce, with a veneer of shameless opportunis­m.

The total costs of the two cancellati­ons could be as high as $1.1-billion, or even $1.6-billion if future anticipate­d savings are not realized. Ms. Lysyk’s report lays out just how many mistakes were made in the McGuinty government’s haste to cancel Oakville and claim a win in a riding that was seen as politicall­y vulnerable. And the mistakes were legion.

It says the government could have walked away from the Oakville plant at a much lower cost because TransCanad­a Energy had run into serious problems getting past legal roadblocks thrown up by the town of Oakville. Ms. Lysyk suggests the government was in a position to just “wait it out” — essentiall­y allow TCE to default on its commitment­s because of its problems getting past municipal interferen­ce. This has long been a contention of NDP MPP Peter Tabuns at the ongoing justice committee hearings into the cancellati­ons, but the government response has only been that their lawyers advised them to take no chances, and to avoid litigation. Ms. Lysyk says the Premier’s Office told TCE that the company would be “kept whole” in the event of a cancellati­on, rather than just letting the legal procedures take their course.

The auditor-general also notes that the government entered into an arbitratio­n agreement that was favourable to TCE, and it ordered the Ontario Power Authority to put the relocated plant in Napanee, which is not serviced by a gas pipeline. In the original Oakville contract, TCE was responsibl­e for transporti­ng natural gas via a pipeline that runs from Sarnia.

On the whole, the report suggests that the Liberals repeatedly took steps that guaranteed a better outcome for TCE, and higher costs to the public. “One of the key decisions that im-

The mistakes were legion

pacted the cost to the public of cancelling the Oakville plant was committing to keep TCE whole,” the report says. “We believe that the settlement with TCE will not only keep TCE whole but may make it better than whole.” The auditor-general says that the relocation was a likely windfall of $225-million for the company.

In the early days of this controvers­y, the Liberals insisted quite strenuousl­y that the final bill for two cancellati­ons and relocation­s was $235-million, and not a penny more. Then tens of thousands of pages of documents were released, Dalton McGuinty quit and pro- rogued the legislatur­e, and it became obvious that there were the numbers that the Liberals presented, and then there were the real numbers.

Under the government of Ms. Wynne, the Liberals’ preferred method of defence — their only defence, really, since the premier has admitted that the cancellati­ons were political in nature and has said repeatedly that she wishes the whole thing was handled differentl­y — has been to try to rationaliz­e the mistakes away by arguing that the two opposition parties were prepared to make them too.

This argument, though, sidesteps the fact that the government of the day has to take responsibi­lity for its decisions, and it was the Liberal government that decided to site the plants in Oakville and Mississaug­a, that signed contracts with developers, and that decided 0to scrap both of them, at a time when all the leverage was with the private power companies, at a cost of what could end up being more than $1-billion. Make no mistake here: It was the Liberals that wanted to take credit for the cancellati­ons, as was evident by the celebrator­y announceme­nts that took place each time. It was only when things went sour did the government try to make the PCs and NDP equal partners in the decision to scrap the plants.

No, this scandal is the Liberals’ to wear alone. With the final bill now in, it’s all the more evident why Mr. McGuinty decided to quit a year ago next week. He knew this was coming. He had many reasons to run.

 ?? FRANK GUNN / THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Ontario auditor-general Bonnie Lysyk said Tuesday the Liberal government led by Dalton McGuinty kept making decisions that increased the final cost of cancelling the two proposed power plants in Mississaug­a and Oakville.
FRANK GUNN / THE CANADIAN PRESS Ontario auditor-general Bonnie Lysyk said Tuesday the Liberal government led by Dalton McGuinty kept making decisions that increased the final cost of cancelling the two proposed power plants in Mississaug­a and Oakville.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada