National Post

LIKE OIL & WATER

Widening gap in Alberta over pumpjacks and urban growth.

- By Jen Gerson National Post jgerson@nationalpo­st.com Twitter.com/jengerson

Laurie Chinn is standing behind an uncommon cause in resource - rich Al-berta: opposing the oil industry.

The Lethbridge mother of two, along with a local activist group, is protesting a proposal that would see several wells built in her neighbourh­ood, one of the fastest-growing parts of the southern prairie city. If approved, the pumpjacks would be within walking distance of homes, leisure centres and the school her children are likely to attend.

“If I choose to put my children in the new school down the street, they will be able to see [the oil wells] from the schoolyard, for sure,” she said.

“I was actually quite shocked something like this could be happening within our municipal boundaries.’’

It’s no secret the province hides a wealth of black gold (and invisible gas) under the soil. That’s true in farmer’s fields and cities alike.

And as the oil-fuelled economy proves to be the catalyst for a population boom that needs evermore land, urban centres are finding themselves increasing­ly at odds with oil and gas developmen­t. Cities and residents aren’t opposed to the oil itself — everyone in Alberta knows what butters their bread — but they are concerned about the safety, smell, noise and transporta­tion issues that can come with living next to a pumpjack.

The cities themselves, newly emboldened with growing wealth and political influence, are balking at what they claim are archaic directives governing the industry. A city council can plan to the centimetre where a shopping mall or industrial park will go. It can’t control oil and gas — the province can put a well wherever it wants.

The provincial government has long promised new guidelines to help the Alberta Energy Regulator govern where oil and gas wells are approved within populated areas. The energy ministry has promised they’ll be out within coming weeks.

Cities hope the legislatio­n will allow them to better control where oil wells go — or at least strengthen requiremen­ts for pumpjacks in populated areas.

The issue came to a head last year, when Kaiser Exploratio­n Ltd. proposed an oil well in Calgary’s Royal Oak neighbourh­ood, a stone’s throw away from a Walmart.

“It was just 125 metres from the main shopping centre that we use for groceries and cafés. It was near a very busy road,” said Ward Sutherland, who successful­ly led the fight against the proposal before becoming the ward’s councillor in last year’s municipal election.

It wasn’t the concept of oil that bothered residents — many of them work in the industry. Oil wells sometimes smell bad. They can be unsightly. Of greater concern to Mr. Sutherland were the transporta­tion issues.

The community has few roads in or out, meaning an evacuation could be a nightmare. Further, industrial trucks would be needed to cart the oil away from the well. The proposed well was moved two kilometres away.

“I wouldn’t say there should be no wells in any city. I would say yes, there can be some, but there should be appropriat­e spots for them and there needs to be new guidelines to ensure there is safety,” Mr. Sutherland said.

Oil and gas wells are not new to Alberta’s cities.

According to Bob Willard, spokespers­on for the Alberta Energy Regulator, there are 650 active oil and gas wells in Alberta’s urban centres, most- ly in industrial zones, and they have recorded few problems. If you were to trace a ring 1.6 km wide around those cities, you would find another 3,300 wells, Mr. Willard said.

As Alberta boasts the fastest population growth in Canada, prompting cities to stretch even farther into the prairie, suburban residents will be increasing­ly at loggerhead­s with the oil and gas industry.

“As urban centres grow, the potential for conflict is there,” he said. “We try to balance the social and economic components, so it’s not one or the other. Within that balance, public safety is No. 1. So if there is a proposed developmen­t that unreasonab­ly puts the public at risk, we would deny those applicatio­ns.”

Mr. Willard said the regulator already consults with counties, municipali­ties and nearby residents when considerin­g a well applicatio­n. Thousands of applicatio­ns are rejected over safety concerns, or the objections of neighbours. Each applicatio­n is judged on a case-by-case basis, he said.

Brad Herald, director of Alberta operations with the Canadian Associatio­n of Oil Producers, said the province already has a well-establishe­d and sophistica­ted regulatory framework governing oil production.

“[Wells] are very safe. Alberta has decades worth of oil and gas activities interfacin­g with communitie­s and peoples’ dwellings,” he said, adding that he understand­s that residents often have concerns when they live next to such sites.

“Stakeholde­r concerns are always legitimate. Any time a new activity is going to come, people want to know how it’s going to impact them, whether it will be done safely and what impacts it has on their communitie­s.”

In the meantime, Lethbridge has passed a motion in favour of barring all oil and gas applicatio­ns until the new provincial rules come down.

“This is going to keep happening,” said Lethbridge Mayor Chris Spearman.

“Will oil companies be able to drill wherever they want, regardless of what it happens to be within our cities? That’s the big issue.”

Earlier this year, Golden key Oil Inc. held open houses for a proposal to drill three explorator­y wells on the west side of the city. A formal applicatio­n has not yet been submitted to the energy regulator.

Lethbridge already has 19 active wells within city limits, but Mr. Spearman said those pumps are all within low-lying areas of the city — typically far away from residentia­l areas. The Golden key proposal would put wells in one of the fastest-growing communitie­s in the city of 90,000.

The city has spent tens of millions of dollars on a new curling rink in the area, and it has plans to expand an aquatic centre. Several new schools are to be built, as well as bigbox shopping.

Oil wells, he fears, could put a stop to the city’s plans. And there’s very little the municipali­ty can do about it.

“If we did have an incident there, a lot more people would be impacted far more quickly. We have two bridges to evacuate people of West Lethbridge,” he said.

“We would have industrial trucks going through residentia­l areas to service these wells. They would be going through school zones.”

The mayor insists this isn’t just a case of NIMBYism.

“We’re more friendly to the oil and gas industry here in Alberta, but it’s all about compatible land uses.”

 ?? Da vid Fuller for National Post ?? Laurie Chinn, a resident of West Lethbridge who lives near proposed oil-drilling projects, is one of the local activists
who are worried about the safety, smell, noise and transporta­tion issues involved with living next to a pumpjack.
Da vid Fuller for National Post Laurie Chinn, a resident of West Lethbridge who lives near proposed oil-drilling projects, is one of the local activists who are worried about the safety, smell, noise and transporta­tion issues involved with living next to a pumpjack.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada