National Post

Women hurt, too

With the focus on concussion in men’s sports, the higher rate of injuries to females is sadly being neglected

- By Marjorie A. Snyder Special to The Washington Post Snyder is senior director of research for the Women’s Sports Foundation in East Meadow, N.Y. She has worked to improve safety and access to sports for girls and women for more than 30 years.

The flood of media attention highlighti­ng damaged brains, dementia and suicides in retired NFL players has made concussion­s synonymous with football. That attention was greatly needed; the debilitati­ng consequenc­es of brain injuries in football players of all ages has been severely overlooked. But the focus of this controvers­y has been far too narrow. It’s true that young players need better equipment and stricter safety standards on the gridiron. But in many of the most popular sports, boys aren’t the ones most likely to be afflicted by concussion­s. Girls are.

Recent studies of high school and collegiate athletes have shown that girls and women suffer from concussion­s at higher rates than boys and men in similar sports — often significan­tly higher. For instance, in a recent analysis of college athletic injuries, female softball players experience­d concussion­s at double the rate of male baseball players. Women also experience­d higher rates of concussion­s than men in basketball and soccer. Across all sports in the study, the highest rate of concussion­s was reported not by male football players, but by female ice hockey players. In that sport, a woman experience­d a concussion once every 1,100 games or practices — nearly three times the rate experience­d in football. The gender disparity exists in high school sports, too. One study, analyzing concussion data for athletes in 25 high schools, found that in soccer, girls experience­d concussion­s at twice the rate of boys.

So why aren’t girls getting as much attention? For one, female athletes haven’t taken up the charge to the degree that profession­al football players have. More female role models need to share their stories and speak out on this issue, to put pressure on schools and leagues to make sports safer for girls and women. Congress also can drive more action, by setting national guidelines on managing concussion­s in young athletes.

We also need more and better science on the gender difference­s in concussion­s. There is painfully little research on why female athletes are so susceptibl­e to athletic brain injuries and how to better protect them. For instance, helmets are mandated in boys’ lacrosse, but not in girls’. Without better science, debate rages over whether helmets would make girls less susceptibl­e to concussion­s, or simply encourage them to be more aggressive on the field, making them more susceptibl­e. And in ice hockey, it’s hard to explain why girls are suffering a higher rate of concussion­s than boys even though intentiona­l body checking is prohibited in the girls’ game.

There are many possible explanatio­ns for why female athletes experience higher rates of concussion­s. The greatest attention has been directed to their head and neck size and musculatur­e; researcher­s speculate that girls have smaller, weaker necks than boys, making their heads more susceptibl­e to trauma. Hormones also could play a role. If a woman suffers a concussion in the premenstru­al phase, when progestero­ne levels are high, there’s an abrupt drop in the hormone. That could cause a kind of withdrawal that either contribute­s to or worsens symptoms like headache, nausea, dizziness and trouble concentrat­ing. This may be why women have more severe or longer-lasting symptoms than men, who have low pre-injury levels of progestero­ne. It’s also possible that, if girls feel the effects of concussion­s more severely, they are simply more likely to report them and doctors more easily diagnose them than in male patients. But for all of these theories, there is little consensus on how they actually play into the mechanism of brain injuries in girls and women.

This makes it difficult to know the best way to prevent concussion­s in girls and women. Do female athletes need better equipment, more neck strength training, better referee calls, or stricter rules to prevent dangerous play? Hockey and lacrosse leagues have taken the latter approach, placing limits on body checking for young players and banning checking to the head and neck area at all levels. There are other sports that can institute similar protection­s. A great example is girls soccer. We know that girls’ neck muscles are not fully developed until age 14. If heading were eliminated for girls below that age, that would prevent concussion without negatively affecting later elite competitio­n prospects. Some schools have begun institutin­g such rules, and more should follow suit.

But there’s a lot of dispute over rule changes, and we need more action now to protect female athletes. First, we need more public awareness about this problem. The Women’s Sports Foundation has made this a priority, holding a congressio­nal briefing with athletes and medical experts last week. In the way that Super Bowl champion Ben Utecht and former wrestler Christophe­r Nowinski have spoken up on the need for better safety for male athletes, we need champion female athletes to do the same for girls and women in sports.

Government­s must play a role in this issue, as well. The U.S. Congress has failed to act on childhood concussion­s, allowing the much-needed ConTACT Act (Concussion Treatment and Care Tools Act) to languish for six years without a vote into law. The ConTACT Act calls for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to adopt national guidelines for identifyin­g possible concussion­s in young athletes, and strict rules about when and under what circumstan­ces injured players should participat­e in practices and games. This way, all schools would be held to the same high standards to ensure student athletes receive proper care for concussion­s. We need to build a culture of support that centres on athlete safety rather than winning the game or a college scholarshi­p.

These rules appropriat­ely would apply to all players, regardless of gender. But we need to go a step further. We have some evidence that the brains of female athletes are more susceptibl­e — or, at least, react differentl­y — to injury compared to their male counterpar­ts. We should stop assuming that concussion­s are a men’s issue. We shouldn’t simply accept that the best practices for boys’ and men’s sports will protect girls and women in the same way. The bodies of female athletes are different and their brains deserve just as much attention.

We need to build a culture of support that centres on athlete safety

 ?? JONATHAN NACKSTRAND / AFP / Getty Images files ?? Women’s hockey is no picnic, as attested to by Canada’s Jayna Hefford, left, tussling with Anne Schleper during the women’s ice hockey gold Medal game between Canada and U.S. at the Sochi Winter Olympics in February 2014.
JONATHAN NACKSTRAND / AFP / Getty Images files Women’s hockey is no picnic, as attested to by Canada’s Jayna Hefford, left, tussling with Anne Schleper during the women’s ice hockey gold Medal game between Canada and U.S. at the Sochi Winter Olympics in February 2014.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada