National Post

Hugo Awards enmeshed in controvers­y yet again

-

The Hugo Awards have been at the centre of controvers­y after two campaigns successful­ly prevented female authors and authors of colour from being proportion­ally nominated. Some people are comparing the controvers­y to #Gamergate, which last year saw coordinate­d misogynist attacks aimed at people who spoke out about sexism in the gaming industry.

In 2014, the Hugo Awards celebrated the increasing diversity of sci-fi and fantasy writers, with younger writers, women and people of colour all picking up awards. At the time, pop culture website io9 commented that the awards heralded “a sea change.”

The nomination­s for this year’s awards were announced this past weekend and showed that two campaign groups, the Gamergate-affiliated Sad Puppies and Rabid Puppies, have succeeded in getting a list of predominat­ely male, white writers nominated.

The Hugo Awards are voted for by members of World Science Fiction Convention, who pay US$40 for membership, which allows them to vote for nomination­s in 2016, too. For the third year running, Sad Puppies encouraged their followers to vote for their selection of nominees, making the greatest impact yet. On Feb. 1, Sad Puppies released their selection, urging readers: “If you agree with our slate below — and we suspect you might — this is YOUR chance to make sure YOUR voice is heard.”

Sad Puppies has been spearheade­d by Brad Torgersen and Larry Correia, two members of the sci-fi and fantasy community who have criticized the “rarefied and insular” group of fans they believe were responsibl­e for women and non-white authors winning Hugo Awards last year.

Torgersen accused the Hugos of being “an affirmativ­e action award: giving Hugos because a writer or artist is (insert under-represente­d minority or victim group here) or because a given work features (insert under-represente­d minority or victim group here) characters.”

Theodore Beale, who goes under the pen-name of Vox Day and runs Rabid Puppies, has received Hugo Award nomination­s in two different Editing categories, following his own inclusion on the Rabid Puppies’ suggested slate. Beale is also lead editor of Castalia House, which has received nine Hugo Award nomination­s this year.

Members of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America have called for Beale’s exclusion from the group after he has written against women’s suffrage and posted racist views toward black writer N.K. Jemisin.

Io9 has commented, “it’s a weird turn of events that, the year after Hurley’s double win, we see [a] list of nominees that includes someone published by Patriarchy Press.” Patriarchy Press is a “joke” e-publisher created by Hugo-nominated author Michael Z. Williamson.

However, voting members and authors have pointed out that there are some nomination­s on the list that were not championed by the Puppies, such as Ann Leckie’s Ancillary

Sword and Listen, which was nominated in the Dramatic Presentati­on category despite an absence on either Puppies’ slate. Annie Bellet, whose short story Goodnight Stars features a non-white female protagonis­t, has been nominated.

Authors nominated on the Puppies’ slates have been turning down the nomination­s. Dave Creek, author of novella The Jenregar and the Light, posted on Facebook: “being linked to Larry Correia makes me uncomforta­ble, and I wouldn’t want to be in the same room with Theodore Beale.”

David Sturridge, who turned down a nomination for Best Fan Writer’s Award, wrote a lengthy explanatio­n as to why he disagreed with Torgersen’s views.

So many members have been saying they will select “No Vote” on all categories that awards organizer Kevin Standlee has written a blog post about the technicali­ties and impact of voting “No Vote.” A “No Vote” works similar to a boycott, in that if a successful “No Vote” is reached, no nominees will be awarded in that category that year.

K. Tempest Bradford, an African-American author and an activist for racial and gender equality within the science fiction community, commented that the Hugo nomination­s are: “a class issue, a race issue, a gender issue. In other words, it’s intersecti­onal.”

As the nomination­s were announced, original Best Novel nominee Correia posted a statement explaining that he had declined the nomination to avoid being “a distractio­n from the overall mission.”

He added: “This is just one little battle in an ongoing culture war between artistic free expression and puritanica­l bullies who think they represent *real* fandom. In the long term I want writers to be free to write whatever they want without fear of social justice witch-hunts, I want creators to not have to worry about silencing themselves to appease the perpetuall­y outraged.”

The Hugo Awards winners will be announced Aug. 22 in a ceremony in Spokane, Wash.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada