National Post

Handing back the keys to the house

‘Jingle mail’ a risk

- By Garry Marr

Francis, a 34-year-old welder from the mining town of Grande Cache, Alta., says he wishes he could get out of the townhouse he bought four years ago.

“At the time, it seemed cheaper,” said Francis, who asked that his last name not be used. “I didn’t want to spend money on rent. But now I think I can find something cheaper to rent.”

He bought the home for $175,000 with a five per cent down payment, but still owes $150,000 on his mortgage. He said the market for his home has collapsed and a realtor just told him the best price he could expect now is $75,000.

“This town is mostly about mines, and now the gold price is down.”

“The town is dead,” he said, frustrated about his situation. He’s also out of luck, if he wants to walk away, because his loan is backed by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., the Crown corporatio­n that controls a majority of the mortgage default insurance market.

Since the loan is “under water,” his bank would be left with a shortfall that CMHC would have to cover. The Crown corporatio­n would likely sue him for any losses it has to cover, so if he has any assets, CMHC will go after him.

Handing over the keys to the house and walking away from your mortgage, called “jingle mail,” was a defining act of the U.S. housing crisis and helped send that market into a deeper tailspin.

It can’t happen here, we’re told. So-called non-recourse mortgages are the rule in at least 10 U.S. states where consumers jumped at the opportunit­y to escape a mortgage that was more than the actual value of their house once the market started to fall.

The problem is it can happen here — in Saskatchew­an and Alberta, the only two provinces that have such rules allowing consumers to walk away from their mortgage. Considerin­g how much listings have spiked in Alberta as people test the market, there is clearly concern among homeowners about whether the value of their property will hold.

Albertans did take advantage of the rule in 1983 and 1984 when home prices fell more than 30 per cent and mortgage delinquenc­y rates rose sharply. Mark Pinsonneau­lt, senior economist with National Bank, said there is little question some Albertans engaged in strategic defaults at the time.

“It really depends on how much equity you have put in,” Pinsonneau­lt said. “The price is going to have to drop at least 20 per cent or more for it to make sense. We are very far from seeing this in Alberta, so far.”

Only those with a loan without mortgage default insurance backed by the government are eligible. Anyone with less than a 20 per cent down payment must get that insurance in Canada. In Saskatchew­an, the rule is limited further and doesn’t allow people with renewed mortgages, as well as no government backing, to walk away.

Before you call your bank, there is the thorny issue of your credit rating. Regina Malina, senior director of decision insights at ratings agency Equifax Canada, said getting another mortgage would likely be more difficult. “It really would depend on how you walked away from your mortgage,” she said. “Frankly, it should impact your credit score.”

Still, the scenario could prove tempting for some if prices in Alberta or Saskatchew­an start to plunge quickly.

“In the lending industry, they call Alberta the wild, wild west because of that,” said Dan Heon, a mortgage broker and the owner of Canadian Mortgage Team Alberta, referring to the non-recourse rules. He says banks tightened standards when the economy buckled in 2008 and some lenders have created structures that force borrowers to give personal guarantees on mortgage loans.

Heon says Alberta created non-recourse loans because the market gyrates so much due to factors such as oil prices, making consumers more leery of taking on loans.

Ray Leclair, vice-president of public affairs with the Lawyers’ Profession­al Indemnity Co., said at least part of the reason non-recourse loans are part of Canada’s landscape is our agricultur­al heritage. “They didn’t want people to lose all of the farming (assets) because of some crisis,” he said.

Leclair said he’s seen non-recourse loans in Ontario, but it requires the mortgage to be drafted differentl­y, including an agreement by the bank that it only has recourse against the property.

In Grand Cache, Francis is in the same boat as residents outside his province. Because of the conditions on his mortgage, he can’t walk away from it.

That leaves the only real way out — declaring bankruptcy.

Andy Fisher, a trustee in bankruptcy with A. Farber and Partners in Toronto, said in Ontario the mortgage holder can go after any of your assets, although some provinces protect funds in your RRSP account. But the banks usually prefer to keep you in your home and paying off that mortgage.

“I can tell you, if you want to keep your house in bankruptcy, and can afford (the mortgage), it’s usually no problem,” said Fisher, noting most financial institutio­ns will come up with a payment plan to keep you in your home.

“I actually see more people with a home that is underwater and they want to keep making the payments and struggle through.”

 ?? Bruce Edwar ds/EdmontonJo­urnal ?? Saskatchew­an and Alberta have rules allowing consumers to walk away from their mortgage.
Bruce Edwar ds/EdmontonJo­urnal Saskatchew­an and Alberta have rules allowing consumers to walk away from their mortgage.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada